DI is looking pretty solid. I predict a solid A-AA score.
It would be a riot!
I'm pretty sure ME2 has its flaws and only someone who has played the game would understand them, so kudos for the author for offering constructive points.
He's legit yo. He gets the interviews and the secret press events.
Maybe he just posted it so people understood.
Reviews are meant to aid in a purchase of a game.
He must have liked the gameplay to rate the game so high.
I've seen many "10/10" reviews that had negative things to say, so I doubt he negated any points for it, considering he wasn't talking personally and just making a general claim.
So many damn French websites.
It's like they popped out of nowhere overnight.
He continues to make excuses by making assumptions. It's logical incoherent to state that.
Who said I'm "Sure" about this game? I wasn't saying anything about MAG's greatness. So telling me to play it is completely irrelevant.
The fact of the matter is that he's telling you people that IGN hated the beta as if that's what they reviewed and you willingly accept it.
It's the typical flip-flop attitude people have with reviews. When they praise a...
I would love to play it on my PS3.
Just really want to see what all this hype is about, and I am starving for RPGs.
Demon's Souls is plenty enough for me, but I want Moar!
You have to be kidding me. MAG gets a decent score from IGN and your still pulling at straws saying that they hated the beta? Give me a break. They rated it a 7/10, just get over it and stop making excuses. They played the full game and didn't like it as much as you did. Why is that so difficult?
Whine all you want about me "stealth trolling". I don't have the same opinion as you, cry some more because I really don't care simply because you make accusations without proof. It's very typical of people like you to simply label me a troll instead of actually ponying up to make an actual relevant response. The only troll is you, since you really don't say anything intellectual in response. What an amazingly easy world it is to just call people trolls and label them as fanboys ins...
I am absolutely fine with suspensions and it's 100% unfair for people who play the game honestly.
However, this hack is one of the most popular ones so it's going to really bring down numbers.
I love how MS does this. They ensure that their community plays fairly and keeps people happy.
Cheating should not happen in a game and there should most definitely be consequences to discourage others from doing it.
However, this should not excuse the...
Crysis is a technical marvel and I expect it to really push the limits for consoles with Crysis 2.
I wonder though if the 360 and PS3 versions are going to have radical differences.
I assume he only leveled up one PMC.
But MP games are always open ended and the carrot-on-a-stick method shouldn't be used to judge longevity of MP games.
I forgot about Vet mode too.
Edit: Actually I think that's exactly what he did lol. Play non-stop.
Either that or he just simply made a calculation based on the time he has already spent on the game.
For once I agree with you.
Probably technical bugs-- I don't think MW2 had any major MP bugs that were noticeable on the surface-- remember that this is a MP only game so it's going to be more criticized than MW2's MP.
Are you talking about hacks and glitches? Again, MW2's MP was touched lightly by reviewers. I guarantee you that if anybody spent time with MW2's MP extensively they would sh*t all over it.
@Unicron
It really is. But MW2 was judged on co-op, MP, and story. It lead ...
"That isn't my complaint. My complaint is that, due to their dominance, players are deleting their Raven and Valor characters and joining the winning team. As a result, most matches are S.V.E.R versus Raven, and S.V.E.R versus Valor. Rarely is it ever Raven versus Valor. This means that S.V.E.R – who were already winning most of their matches – was now also playing many more matches than either of the other PMCs, and as a result, their victories were compounding."
That ...
Many fanboys kept insisting that more players= better game and kept trying to spit on lower-numbered games which was very stupid of them. I take pleasure in laughing at them now.
Anyways, whether that statement applies to MAG or not is a mixed bag since the opinion is so split.
I expected higher from IGN and considering that I did believe the game would open up with more time spent with it. Regardless, it's still a good score and in no way should this be looked down ...
The idea of getting all players on screen is quite a thought.
It'd be funny trying to convince 256 players to do it and they are absolutely right: there's always that one guy who'd throw a grenade.
Imagine how funny it would be if that were to happen and all hell breaks lose.
Actually, I wonder if they would add some sort of S&D mode or a mode where you have a preset amount of lives (just 1 for example). It would probably annoy early players who die,...
But a pretty solid score.
Actually I'm a little surprised, but not upset. HR is not exactly traditional so I can understand if people don't connect with the game as much as the next guy.
But regardless it's a solid score.
"Contrary to promises, the phases of QTE are still extremely numerous and their repetition is no shortage of annoying. The sequences of travel and research are only slightly less painful. The will of David Cage make the player feel...
yeah, likely something to do with the blu ray.
As for Sony launching head to head with the 360:
I think it would have made the PS3 look weaker. Their launch lineup was poor compared to the PS2's and 360s.
However, as for if it would have changed anything, I definitely think so.
I feel that people rushed to the 360 because it was the "new console" and it was next gen. People buy consoles on impulse and if it were a head to head comp...
I just play it free on the PC.
Seems like a quick cash-in for EA. Luckily I'm too busy hating on Activision to care about them.