i could say something similar, its one thing to like it, and another to say there isnt anything wrong with the endings... they are filled with plot holes, canon errors and completely nonsensical stuff
there are probably more red/green/blue explosions.. and now Anderson and Hacket also come out of the Normandy, lol
whats the problem, it could be a lower end 7000... its not like there arent huge diferences between cards of the same series
16 core processor.... yeah right... and the version without HDD will cost $1000 -_-"
Whoever makes up these "rumors" could at least try to keep thing grounded in reality... like what he says about a 7000 series, thats perfectly normal, especially considering how vague that information is because there can be huge diference between cards of the 7000 series
up until the whole disaster that has happened with ME3 (which i honestly have no way to prove EA is involved) i actually thought they were doing pretty good this gen. Lots of good games, several new IP's, some of the yearly releases actually advanced a lot(like Fifa)
aw c'mon dont be so naive disagreer, its not like im complaining about free dlc, i loved that they are adding a lot of new stuff, especially new maps since characters and weapons are a pain to unlock..
But still, they released day one paid DLC, they even told you to buy DLC after the ending, and now you think they had planned to release this many things for free? especially considering you normally have to pay for less stuff? its just normal PR damage control, so i guess ...
more like 1 reason: its awesome
How much would you bet this was originally gonna be paid dlc? It certainly has enough content to be like that. Though i doubt we will get any more dlc for free, this is just to clean their image a little after so much controversy
please do enlighten us with your knowledge since you seem to understand all the nonsense, you probably wont even read everything below, seeing how big it is, but maybe you could share some of your knowledge and answer a couple of this questions with hard facts
-why does the alliance soldier says no one made it to the beam when they could have clearly seen you and anderson made it?
-Why does anderson show up 1st to the control panel when he entered after shepard and th...
not really, the real intended ending was changed because of a leak, funny how their artistic vision didnt matter there...
also if you look at the press releases/interviews during development, its really hard to agree that anything they said they were doing in the ending was actually done. So they were either lying during those interviews or decided their artistic vision didnt matter again and changed it one more time
well i would react in the same way i have acted now, which is insulted at how easily bioware has gotten with lying to their fans. I mean, they did said numerous times that this was the end of shepards story, and that they wouldnt have to worry about how ME3 ending would affect a future release.
So if thats the case, i would just add it to the list of lies bioware said before the release of ME3
well not really hit their wallets because for someone to complain about the ending, it generally means they already bought the game. Mostly i think they realized they screwed their fans and now they are trying to do something about it, though im not sure this is the right path
well i wont lie and say im not dissapointed... in a way im happy they are doing SOMETHING about the ending, but i doubt this is the way to go... but i wont pass judgement until i actually see it.
The thing is, if this is just going to be cutscenes about what happened to the characters (which most magically teleported to the normandy...) then it just sucks, 1st because it should have been in the game from the start, 2nd because it still doesnt correct whats wrong.
Maybe they didnt make a contract like you say, but they certainly said many things in interview and press releases that turned out to be misleading statements(which is a nice way to say they blatantly lied to their customers to create more hype)
i guess they realized that the Wii's Little King Story graphical style might have led people to misjudged the game as a kids game, and miss out on one hell of a game.
I really like the fact that it seems like its a real continuation of the story with the king maybe a bit older, but with the same characters as before, or is this the same game but with new graphical style?? because i dont remember any white haired guy in the wii game
I disagree, it really doesnt add anything to the story thats worth the price. Just a couple of interesting facts and some nice cutscenes, nothing special.
The only people that should buy this are the ones interested in an extra character and new costumes
Well whenever both companies release similar cards i stick with nvidia because it has better driver support
@da_2pacalypse
well just not buying the game wont actually do anything to solve a problem if you dont speak up about the problem 1st of all. Otherwise you are not buying the game, but never telling the devs why
jacob from ME is not bad
Well the clarification could be a video showing shepard waking up from the rubble and harbinger saying that control failed or something like that.... Though i really doubt it