Every single one of those will be exclusive. Prepare your anus.
@DigitalHope
Name checks out 😂
It will never come to Playstation buddy, let it go.
Elder Scrolls 6, The next Doom, Fallout, Wolfenstein.
All of it will be exclusive. Either build a PC or get an Xbox if you wanna play those.
I think Fable is gonna blow us the f**k away graphically (Look at what Horizon 5 looks like to get an idea)
Avowed will have the best story by far (It's Obsidian after all) .
Starfield will have the best exploration and discovery.
Outerworlds 2 will be the most fun and hilarious.
For me personally I'm looking most forward to Fable and Avowed a close 2nd.
This isn't a Switch like Series S at all lol
But I still believe one is coming sooner or later
Huh? Fallen Order was incomplete? How?
If you play more than 2 games a year, it's worth the full price.
I play 3 games every month.
I don't agree or disagree with what you're saying, I'm just the messenger. Playstation games sell well enough without them being on PC or a GamePass like service.
Sony is definitely gonna lose in quantity of exclusive games.
Xbox is going to have more than double the amount of studios, by the end of the year.
It's 13 vs 23 at this moment. Not even including the multiple teams within those studios that also make games.
The mathematics are not in Sony's favor.
Quality is subjective. Metacritic is not a measurement of how much enjoyment you'll get
Playstation fans do not want a GamePass style service, they do not want PC gamers to play their games, they've made that very clear.
Why are we so biased about Single Player vs Multiplayer games?
Theres constantly single player only games coming out for 70 dollars with no multiplayer(As a matter of fact they're praised for it a lot of the time) . But when it's a multiplayer only game without campaign it's a problem?
I think there's room for games that only focuses on multiplayer. I personally dont have a problem with BF not having campaign.
But when y...
I don't think E3 charges them that much money. E3 needs Sony more than Sony needs E3. That goes for Nintendo and Xbox as well.
Nobody "Needs" E3 anymore in a business sense. But I think E3 is the superbowl of gaming, and it's a fun thing for fans to watch the conferences back to back and having discussions on who won.
It's a damn shame that we're pretty much starting to see the end of it.
None of the big 3 are really att...
"All they have to do is..."
You think they lower the resolution for no good reason? It's obviously a technical problem with the code that doesn't allow them to do that smh. If they could do it they obviously would have like with the rest of the games that support FPS boost.
It's not a matter of them not wanting to.
Dude you're losing the plot here. Those 50 million gamepass subs on PC would still be Gamepass subs. Xbox does not see them as separate entities.
Xbox is a platform that spans PC and Mobile now.
I was talking about GamePass which is on more than just Xbox.
Like i said if gamepass reaches a certain milestone Gold will go away. It doesn't matter where those subs come from.
You do know Gamepass is on PC and Mobile too right?
As for my source, They have not said it publicly (Obviously ,why would they?) ,i've heard it from Xbox insiders who talk to people at Microsoft.
Nowhere, I've heard they do not like Xbox Live Gold at all, and they wanna get rid of it, but they can't justify removing it to their finance team cuz it's making a lot of money.
It will be removed once gamepass has reached a certain internal milestone. My guess is 50 million subscribers.
I'll take less peas for 60 fps
Come on man this is stupid, this isn't even a fair fight.
Insecure PS fanboys incoming
He can't be allergic to Xbox if he plays xbox games on his PC though...