@neo People do make a comparison when a ps3 game looks better than the 360,most people expected the wiiu to be considerably better because everything Sony & Ms did wrong in terms of hardware,it should've been easy for nintendo to make something efficient & powerful.
@neo some of those multiplats look a bit better not substantially better and as some one pointed out it's architecture than clock speed but the wiiu CPU is a refined wii CPU,it self being a refined gamecube CPU,architecture will only take so far until both aspect come in to play.
The wii did so well because the wiimote and the ps360 are 30 mil in reaching distance of the wii,3ds sales were no better than the ps vita until price cut,ds cheapest handheld.
@theps3 activison was suppose to have developed the game but some nihilistic got hold of the game with 6-8 month dev cycle.
@msmacky How is that? They didn't have a game that used motion in an non obvious way on top of that ,the wii didn't worked as most people thought.
@Griffin What does it matter that I'm a virgin?its not bothering me none.
@thefinal that's what hd porn for.
That's stupid, unless you like games in general than it makes no sense to own all of those consoles,one should be sufficient.
@testerg Those names are not for his/her comment in this article but other article where he/she took those statement out of context.
@mr-zex logicwins name is all wrong it should be "spin doctor" or "sir twist-a-lot" because that's all he/she does.
Sony could put a radeon 7770 gpu in the ps4 it cost 130 and runs bf3 @1080p to 30-40 fps on ultra and the ps4 is rumored to include an apu that probably could help the gpu.
@maniac that's not entirely true because Sony & Ms both had motion type devices on their consoles with the eyetoy- ps eye & xbox vision cam,I don't think it was a reaction but more of a prioritization .
But the eyetoy was marketed for casual gamers as for the ps eye I believe it's focus was to have a broader appeal than just serving casuals.
@fat move was design for both casual and core,just search for iwaggle3d on you tube. How is the move a copy? The ps eye was released before the move,if it was a copy than nintendo didn't look at all the options to have a accurate motion controller
@shok lies,it's the developers choice not necessarily the hardware that dictates the way a game looks and you have to take in to account other factors as why some studios closed than just game cost.
@dead if rumors are true that Sony is putting and apu in the ps4 then I believe it shouldn't be that expensive,I though of a mock ps4 that should be powerful for a console.
CPU/aup.a10 5700
Price $122 tdp 65 watts
Gpu radeon 7770
Price $109-130 tdp 80 watts
Motherboard bases of the amd fm2 chipset
Price $40-73.
Only thing I can't account for is ram type and quantity but I read that stacked DDR 3 is less power hungry and ...
@neo the difference between the move & wii is,move works as advertise & wii doesn't,Sony had the similar casual games as nintendo fit the ps2 with eyetoy.
Check out thrill kill on YouTube.
If I remember right,they are the people who made metro 2033 based in Ukraine and where formed from the guys who made the stalker series of game(stalker clear skies,shadows of Chernobyl and call of Pripyat.)
Dude!that's hella funny.
@tbird Just because nintendo didn't focus on graphical power doesn't mean Sony/Ms can't have a systems that beats nintendo's,it depends on what they won't to accomplished with their system.