Still doesn't look as good as when we first saw it at E3. E3 build was incredibly good looking, even thought it had no visual effects. Now it just looks Ok, which makes it even less impressive when compared to DriveClub. The night driving in DC makes Forza look last-gen. Ah well, Project Cars shits on both anyway. Can't wait for that game..
The quality of Youtube videos can't keep up with the newer games footage and they probably already know this. Expect to see some form of update on video playback from them sometime soon. Might even incorporate 60fps playback, like Gamersyde.
Great idea making all maps free, which is going to keep the community from becoming separated. Gg, GG!!!
I have to agree about the lack of feasible power consumption numbers and CPU clocks information. However, there is a scheduled keynote about the PS4 coming up and I can only assume that they might finally reveal some more information on the specifics of the PS4 specs wise, which would include clock speeds and performance numbers.
Looking forward to finally picking it up.
It's been a long time coming for the PS3s big brother.
I agree, the console version does look incredibly bad compared to other titles, but the PC version is nothing to cheer about either. The game is far from looking great but hopefully both will improve before their release, though PC has less time to improve compared to it's next-gen counterpart. Just being honest, the PC footage I have seen looks like BF3 on PC at 1080p/30fps with medium settings. Terribly choppy, washed out textures especially along the shore line in Paracel Storm and hea...
If that is correct, then the grater performance on consoles will belong to the Xbox One because it has a balanced(weak) CPU and GPU, whilst the PS4 has a pretty strong GPU and weak CPU, thus bottlenecking any advantage the PS4 would have.
$400 dollars for online accumulates to 8 years worth of online. If you don't upgrade that PC by that time, you will not be out-performing anything which includes the PS4. Forget about running it at a superior resolution and frame-rate. Comparable specs to the PS4 in a PC won't even run a game 8 years from now on low settings.
True statement.
PC gaming depends ENTIRELY on the raw power of your individual parts because developers do next no optimization for the games. If somebody has better specs than you in the PC gaming community, they will always have better graphics than you will unless you upgrade past their own specs. The luxury that we enjoy relies solely on both our willingness and ability to upgrade core system specs. No such dilemma exist on consoles, which in the gaming industry is seen as a massi...
Intrigueing
Are they giving up on the XB1 before it even launches, or are they simply trying to create a localized console within China to garner massive market share before Sony has the chance gain any with Vita TV and PS4? This is quite shocking...
What's GPU, CPU, RAM set-up?
Cool, I guess.
Mods will still make it 10x better so there's no need to make that giant world register with 2k textures; the excess work isn't necessary. Modders will do it for you.
Oh really? I had no idea they didn't make plasma anymore. Oh well, I'll just get an LED then. I Plasma has a slightly better resolution when it comes to TV and films but that doesn't factor into gaming so I'll be Ok. Won't be gaming much on PS4 anyway other than those premier exclusives that Sony always seems to push out. Multi-plats are PC bound now. :D
Never head the word amazing so times.
Keko magai.....
Anyways, thinking about upgrading to a 240hz TV, as next-gen is going to require at least 120hz for games to trult enjoyed. It looks like a lot of developers are finally giving console players 60fps, so ultra smooth, low latency TVs are going to be at a premium now.
Probably pick a Sony Plasma 240hz, as I've never had any other TV brand in my house except for Sony.
Really impressed with what they've managed to pull together so far, considering that they don't even have 1/10 the budget that Forza or GT gets. Only next-gen racer right now that is even remotely close to Project Cars in the visual effects department(not resolution or fps, though). If they can achieve 60fps, this game by far supplants Forza 5 as "king of the console" racers until the true king Gran Turismo 7 comes out. Project Cars will be smashing them all though, maybe GT...
PS4 and XB1 will not be experiencing everything next-gen about this title. None of you will be gaming at 1080p/60fps at ultra settings because the hardware isn't capable of it, at least with this game anyway. More than likely 900p/60fps at medium settings which is OK, I guess.
Neither of these titles were "made for PS4 & XB1" because the engine they utilize is primarily geared towards PC. This article is such complete bullshit and PR at it's best merely to try and qualm the console exclusives players.
Something to take note of here: This article stipulates that these titles were made from the ground up for next-gen consoles(again not true but whatever.) Why is then that these early titles can't accomplish 1080p/60fps if next-...
Old footage...
Waste of my time -.-
Hi Cunni
You think Killzone: SF looks sub-hd? I knows it's not Metro: Last Light at 1440p/60fps(recently bought the game; the game is an absolute visual masterpiece. Consoles will never be able to match it) but KZ is technically Full HD in 1080p even it doesn't attain 60 fps in single-player.
The game does look good but it's not using "the most advanced technology". I don't know where you got that from, but it isn't the case. The FPS genre generally sticks to the same types of visual effects, lighting, generally stays away from physics computation, character animations, post-processing, exc. exc. They generally even use the same type of anti-aliasing(with only COD using the inferior FXAA and BF using stronger types of AA if the hardware used can support it pr...