positivegamer.com re-directs to negativegamer.com :P
It's a light-hearted list. Also, thanks to Killjoy3000 for noticing the URL, I find most people who come to NG seem confused as to why everything seems to negative :)
I already have one.. but another would come in handy.
Not sure I'm with you. What would the flame war be about? As far as I was aware, many people have been at least slightly disappointed by Nintendo this generation. However, as the article explains, there are good games coming out soon.
If people simply read the headline, and assume they know what the article about and start a flame war off that presumption, then there is little I can do and I think those people are idiots.
I felt that the title correctly represents wh...
People who want to buy the game legally.
The game MS gave away for free to say "sorry" for Live being down last Christmas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
haha, I have a PS3 sat next to it. Not sure why but it does look a bit more smug than usual.
I disagree
Surprisingly, it is actually a very good arena shoot 'em up. Once you get over the fact it's about as offensive as South Park, it's an annoyingly good game.
The server started giving 404s within a few hours of the game being reposted. Either crashed/overwhelmed, or the host pulled the plug.
The right too free speech does not grant the right to be listened too.
If he made something that people found interesting, you shouldn't get in the way of that. If you would like to put forth the counter augment,then you can do that.
If you are not trying to counter, but trying to block, then that is kinda going against the right to free speech.
Nobody is forcing anybody to play this game, in the same way nobody forced anyone to look at those harmless cartoons....
@mohib-uddin7986532
Though, if the apology is to be believed, the game is satire so it's not quite the same.
After playing it, it's about on par with South Park tbh.
I'm curious, do people think this is a genuine apology, a whole new level of joke, or just limiting the hate?
...could it really be said to be un-bais reporting when the Telegraph, a well know campaigner against videogames, is their only source?
Kotaku didn't really have an opinion on the game. They mearly reported on it's existence and that people who know nothing about videogames are condemning it. I think that's where the problem is.
If it's going to be condemned for being in poor taste, at least let us gamers do it!
but the graphics, esp the little bars, are part of the gameplay.
People care when it actually gets in the way of the game play. Not being able to see if you are failing or not is quite a big part.
though it needs more dancing.
Nobody tell Denis Dyack.
I've already had to set the comments to users only. I guess LBP is serious business :)