Dude..pc version is almost always $10 cheaper (with the exception of COD). so yes, console version will be 59.99 and pc version will be 49.99
Really bad theories with the exception of theory 6. The wording is very similar to GlaDos, so its definitely Portal related. Probably some kind of tech demo, dlc, or early release date for Steam users
Halo franchise should definitely be there, and whoever thinks otherwise please provide a strong argument to why, because the Halo games have provided emotional and powerful musical scores.
Wow the jet gameplay looks Orgasmatron 9000
What do graphics have to do with COD on consoles being better? Dice has already stated that the PC version will be far superior to the console version, but the graphics in the console version will still be far better than COD's cartoony look. I mean look at BC2, that game looked pretty amazing on my ps3.
Although I do agree completely with you that its not fair to charge MORE for the console version when it is inferior, but i still think DICE will make sure the console v...
I'm guessing DLC announcement, since many developers this gen seem to be joining the pre-release DLC announcement bandwagon. Although I doubt Valve would be one of them.
I hope not, starcraft is doing just fine as an RTS and I personally don't think its universe is as fascinating as warcraft's. I hope its a new IP.
Ah makes sense, since they don't want to spoil campaign for us. Thanks for the response :D
Question for those already in Beta. Are you able to play single player missions as well, or only user generated content?
Nobody cares if you prefer COD over Battlefield so don't try to make it seem as us 'battlefield fanboys' give a crap what you think. COD WAS more fun than Battlefield maybe before World at war, but after, it just became a repetitive game with poorer graphics, hacks galore, tons of bugs, and oh lets not forget a community mainly composed of immature teenagers.
So in MY opinion, I think Battlefield bad company 2 was far superior in both gameplay and graphics to COD...
4 years ahead? Not likely. Crysis is the only exception, but so far I haven't seen any pc games that have large differences in graphical quality from their console counterparts.
Ah k thanks. Its just that I thought it was on the 19th but then I went on IGN's site and it said the 22nd for NA so I got confused
Deadly premonition is meant as a joke review. If you took that review seriously then I feel sorry for you
Of course it makes sense for Wii2 to be more powerful than ps3 and 360. Its release will probably mark the next generation of consoles. Releasing another low-performance console would be pathetic after having 5 years of development (Wii was released in 2006). The question is HOW much more powerful is the Wii2 over the current gen consoles?
I love Valve, amazing developer who really listens to their customers. I can't wait to get my hands on this game. And i will be enjoying cake while playing
Oh yeah..its EA's fault rite? If what you are assuming is true, how about Bioware who agreed to dumb down their games? If you tell your friend to hit a person in the head, and they do it, who's fault is it?
Is this game coming out on the 22nd or 19th in NA? Somebody please tell me because im confused :S
Wow this game's been getting alot of coverage lately from IGN. Seeing how they loved (and myself as well) the last 2 games, i'm not surprised. I can't wait for September!
I don't understand why the rumored area is news..I mean it's just a wishlist by fans of games they want to see. Anyone could make that, it doesn't mean that we should release it as news.
Seriously, not one of them had to say a genuinely bad thing about the game? Its hard to believe that reviewers - whose job is centered around criticizing, found next to nothing bad about the game. I'm not dissing Gears of War 3, the game looks amazingly fun, but every game has something bad about it. I'm beginning to think they are either stupidly optimistic (and only nitpick when they do the review) or they are paid by Epic.