I've been loving it so far, though the "no menu" stuff is annoying
Lulz @ 69
Meh, nothing for me.
My brother pre-ordered it.
Which sucks, because now I'll have to wait like a week before I can play it.
I thought it was awful. Bad voice acting, awful combat, and repetitive gameplay.
IGN is a good website for news, and their reviews are typically on the money.
This is a childish article.
Ooooold
I knew immediately that it was him when I saw the score.
Yep, that's God of War, all right.
I was thinking the same thing. How has this website played the game and websites like GameSpot and IGN haven't?
I hope no one is anticipating this. Every time a new movie game is announced, people think "Well, that sounds cool. Could this be the end of bad movie games?"
But we all know this game is going to suck. The graphics will be ugly, the bosses will be poorly done SotC rip-offs, the combat will be clunky and shallow, and the facial animation will be scary.
I know I'm going to be flamed, but whatever, we're all thinking it.
Spoiler alert?
Who cares if the character's gay or not? As long as gays are portrayed in an offensive/discriminating manor, it doesn't matter. Just look at Brokeback Mountain. The two characters were gay, but they didn't act like it. If Cliff can pull something off like that, then it could be interesting.
Every game has clipping. Making an article about this is one thing, but calling it major is asinine.
It was ugly two months ago and it's ugly now.
This is seriously old news. Like, a few months old.
@Acquiescence
It's not the site that sucks, it's Jim Sterling.
If they're referring to campaign length, then that means that this game is around 6 hours long.
Sounds good. I'm not happy about the whole "improvised weapons" and nail/can grenades, though. I hope the weapons don't look like they're made from junk or something.
It probably won't even have a game. The Dark Knight didn't.