It's not capcom's fault. Everybody does that with 360 ports. Fallout 3, Oblivion, and Bioshock have 5GB (or more)installs. Now that you mentioned it mgs4 had a 4GB install even though it was optimized for the ps3. Bluray just isn't fast enough to match streaming from the hard drive or even DVD9's speed of streaming.
Or you could make a stupid comment on N4G so everyone know what an idiot you are (not talking about you, just adding to you illustrious list).
well you have to consider whether you want 5GB of useless data on your harddrive just to play a game that graphically is superior on the 360 (which doesn't need an install if don't already know).
the generation isn't over yet. A lot of these games will be replaced in the future.
I'm sold.
screen tearing isn't that big of a deal.GOW had screen tearing but I didn't care, it doesn't affect game performance like frame rate drops do. I would prefer the 360 version because that saves over 4 GB of data on your hard drive. Don't understand why the install is so big on so many games that can work on the 360 without a harddrive.
:)
The only negative thing I can read about this is that it doesn't have bots. But a few are a little out of place for COD. Vehicles, tags, video saves, what are they trying to be halo or something?
you do know the ps3 version of the orange box sucked right? I'm not trying to hate but they screwed up on the ps3 version. In that case a port might not be so good.
It still should sell more. Think of the halo 3 sales when it's userbase was smaller than the ps3's now. And a 91% on metacritic isn't exactly killing halo review-wise. At least it's dominating fanboy-wise:)
"Killzone 2= more intense and visceral single-player, coupled with deeper, more feature-enriched and tactical multiplayer."
I agree with everything except the "more feature-enriched multiplayer."
I mean really look at the features. Halo has 4-player co-op campaign , Forge mode, video saves, and a robust multiplayer to go with it.
Killzone 2 has co-op-less campaign. And a robust multiplayer.
When it comes to more for your...
Haha good one. You'd have to be pretty stupid to buy both versions. Even if the 360 version has a few anti-aliasing issues, it still is the only console version to offer TRUE HD 720p. The ps3 version is at alower resolution natively and upscaled to 720p.
of course we've been over this already and fanboys can argue whatever.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
they had gears 2. But didn't announce it til a few months before it released the same year.
Last I checked the ps3 sold less in the 08 holiday then it did in 07. That isn't good. And you know good and well outside of it's graphics and 7.1 ss, this game doesn't bring anything you haven't seen in games like COD4 or TF2. That's why it's dropped from a 98% to 91% on metacritic.
http://www.metacritic.com/g...
I'm not. My psp 2000 works great and doesn't have scan lines appearing randomly.
hopefully it isn't a ds port. Then it really would suck.
Name an rts on the ps3 that is better than this. That's right you flop at life!
funny you should say speech. when I'm on the PSN. Only a few people have mics to talk in. A little ironic that they aren't "speaking."
a year late on the ps3 as usual.
"Resistance 3 needs to be third person. This looks so much better than R2."
LOL then it would be gears of war. Did you just admit(unknowingly of course) gears is better than resistance.