i really don't like multiplayer with mario. The option would be nice, but this isn't a game breaker by any means. There seems to be a huge contradiction on here about multiplayer. People say don't shove it in and waste resources if its not needed, then they complain when games don't have it.
if you like awesome shooter fun without a lot of extra stuff, i recommend call of juarez gunslinger, and serious sam 3: BFE. both of those games are fun as hell.
it worked natively with the 360 controller, and you could mod hi res textures into the game. also the framerate didnt drop in the new londo ruins like it did every single time on the ps3 version. played the whole game on both versions, the pc version was much smoother.
stealth fanboy trolling.
thats prior to driver updates, the game was poorly optimized when it first came out.
bioshock would have been almost a perfect game if not for the same old shooter sections. I thought the game was so innovative at first, then i started shooting boring enemies for hours, and it went downhill from there. i wish games could innovate in storytelling with innovative gameplay mechanics on top of it. games break up the flow with forced sections of shooting countless enemies.
^sorry having an opinion on a gaming forum about games is a mission, but all the CoD suxxx statements are ok. I was excited about this game, put a lot of hours into it, i'm just saying its a shallow experience that most people quit after a couple of days. and the ps4 elitism is by far above pc elitism, i was merely pointing out that it doesn't take a lot of horsepower to max it. sorry you can't stand opinions that dont agree with yours.
this game really isn't very fun.
shooter, shooter, and shooter. This is the problem with games these days.
this will be fun on PC more than likely, probably not ground breaking, but an enjoyable game worth buying.
Witcher 3 and monolith's X looked best at e3
Not hard to do considering the game is really not very graphically impressive. Yes it is poorly optimized so the framerate is low for its quality of graphics, but my mid range card from 2 years ago can max it and stay above 30fps. GTX 560 specifically.
^ I've seen the statement numerous times on here
you people on here need to realize that doubling the ram isn't gonna double the graphics. It has more to do with the gpu/cpu. Most of the amazing looking PC games on PC take up only a couple gigs of ram.
skyrim is the most overrated game this generation.
geralt of rivia
i'm going to get bayonetta on 360 or ps3 to get ready for this game
same, i still have a gtx 550 ti that does surprisingly well. was thinking about going amd this time maybe a 7000 series
bring over tribes ascend, however the ski thing might feel awkward on controller, but it'd be cool to get a larger crowd into the game.
that game was underrated.
not sure if you own a Wii U, but their online is way better than the wii's and innovates in a lot of ways beyond the other consoles. Now they're gonna get attacked for not attaching multiplayer to every game?
Not to mention its free, something neither of the other consoles can say anymore.