yes, it does look better than NSMBU, but that isnt saying much, is it.
it still has that same 'no frills' by-the-numbers look to it.
just because a game is about gameplay doesnt mean it cant have fantastic graphics.
the original donkey kong country on the snes was famed for its beautiful graphics. and it was a great game, gameplay wise.
why cant this game achieve the same? its just horrible art direction
theres something unimpressive about those graphics.
they should have went with a rayman sort of art style.. all those polygons make it look so blocky, when it should look beautiful.
lets be completely honest, it looks like a hi-res wii game. sort of like NSMBU.
...
...
nintendo used to make products that were aggressive in their placement on the market. they used to make truly cutting edge technology and be at the forefront of creativity in games.
that is all gone now. that is the past. the nintendo of today are happy to sit in an obscure part of the market- as long as they make profit. they arent all about pleasing the consumer anymore, they are about putting out products which are economically viable, for them to make massive profits.
...
wow, two games. pikmin is not the sort of game you blow £200 to play. and while mario 3d world sounds amazing, its also not something so revolutionary that people will rush out to buy a wiiu to experience. the sales figures back up my claim.
people want something immersive, something with lots of replay value. something like metroid or zelda. which are nowhere on the horizon...
at this point, i predict you will reply saying ''oh, but mario kart a...
its that simple.
yes, they stole almost every feature nintendo ever invented for the modern control pad. they also completely ripped off the wiimote with move.
heck, the playstation itself is a tear-away project that original started in collaboration with nintendo.
thats how sony conducts its R&D, buy nintendo consoles and games, copy the games, steal ideas from the tech.
'It matters how big of a role Nintendo plays in the development.''
my guess is the only role nintendo has is licensing the zelda name, universe and all its elements to the developer.
just like metroid other m.
also, remember how sonic lost world was a 'collaboration' between sega and nintendo. it quite clearly wasnt. it just meant it was exclusive for the wiiu/nintendo were publishing it.
i dont think n...
a lot of people probably never thought twice of dynasty warriors and would probably never buy it. but now this zelda version is coming, people will change their tune.
i think its a bad idea. personally, i would never buy dynasty warriors, and i dont think dynasty warriors in a zelda disguise is going to make me change my mind
this game will most likely turn out like metroid: other m... iconic characters and familiar elements in a mediocre game
graphics look awful and the gameplay looks shallow.
my guess is wiiu zelda is a long way off, which is why they keep giving us these other zelda games...
lets be honest, nobody wanted a zelda crossover with dynasty warriors.. but that is nintendo all over, most unexpected.
haha :D
it draws upon this history in the smash bros games with characters spanning 30 years of nintendo gaming. plus now with other iconic characters from other companies.
its a celebration of gaming
everyone and their grandma had wii fit (literally,) now wii fit u isnt even hitting top forty.
exactly. its just commenting on the facts. if the wiiu was a sales sensation and i said ''wow, the wiiu is incredibly successful, congrats to nintendo'' nobody would scream troll. i would get thumbs up.
but when i say ''wow, the wiiu is doing incredibly bad, it sucks right now for nintendo and its gamers'' people scream troll. people hate negativity, even if the truth is negative.
i will get 'disagrees' for this comment...
lmao @ admiralvic
do i not have a point?
its not trolling if its a very good point.
you only scream troll because its the only defense against what is a very good argument.
in short, what im saying is true, hence, not trolling. its merely something you dont like to hear.
heck, i dont like the fact the wiiu is failing, but believing it isnt failing isnt making it a success. see what i mean?
haha nice try.
do you wear glasses? if so, you must not have them on, because this game is not my idea of great looking. merely functional graphics. actually, i would even call them ugly.
they have no style (apart from being ugly,) they merely function. ie donkey kong is on the screen and he is in a frozen/icy place. there.
they have done nothing to make it special. no awards will be won for art design, that is for sure.