How dumb
It could get a 44% score but I bet it would outsells BC2.
Why because its a proper Battlefield.
Edit:
Oh its Pachter, this explains everything.... *facepalm*
Its aimed at people running 2560 by 1600 and/or multi monitor set-ups.
If your not aware 2560 by 1600 is 198% more pixels than 1080p.
I would not bother with this to be honest.
Rather get GTX 580 SLi or GTX 560 SLi
If EVGA do a GTX 560 2win that would be better in terms of power and thermals plus performance would not be that far off.
One of the best games ever made.
Team Fortress 2 just proves that FPS can be different and diverse compared to the boring and typical CoD and MoH games.
Valve just delivers and delivers all the time, less than 1 month till Portal 2
Sorry your wrong
Crysis came on release with:
Low, Medium, High and Very High.
It still has the same setting today.
Very High required DX10 (Vista or 7) but could be hacked or modded to work with DX9 (XP)
Crysis Warhead came on release with:
Minimum, Mainstream, Gamer and Enthusiast.
Again it still had the same setting since release
Enthusiast = Very High but this time DX10 worked
This must of b...
Guys I would know why some of you are so pissed off
I was thinking it was a port but less so now.
We are getting 4 setting on release and maybe a 5th one after DX11 patch
Gamer = Low
Advanced = Medium
Hardcore = High
Extreme = Very High
Maximum Extreme = Very High with DX11 - Ultra High. (patched in)
Plus you will be able to modify the graphics setting individually like Crysis and Warhead through config...
CryEngine 3 Real-time, all the time.
PC man we could be getting 5 graphics setting be the looks of it.
Gamer - Low
Advanced - Medium
Hardcore - High
Extreme - Very High
Maximum Extreme - Ultra High
I'm guessing Maximum Extreme will be the same as Extreme but with DX11 that is coming in a patch.
Also just like Crysis and Crysis Warhead you will be able to modify the config files to completely customi...
1st iRacing
2nd rFactor
3rd Gran Turismo 5
Just got Platinum on GT5 and KZ3 XD
PS3 not doing so bad considering the demo was ported from the 360.
PC demo was also ported from the 360 but of course with many times more computation power it would be better.
People make final judgement on final release product not ported demos.
I own PS3, 360, Wii, DSi and PSP
All fall into submission to my glorious God-like 2.7Tflop/s PC
Consoles are great for exclusives like: Uncharted; Zelda and Halo
However when you get more exclusives on PC plus 3rd party games that just destroy consoles in every way possible there is just no way going back.
PC it only does everything.
Said this yesterday and just on another post
The demo was a 360 port, for both PC and PS3.
If the full game is like this then rightfully get pissed off.
I personally think Microshaft had something to do with it.
Don't get for multiplayer becuase its poo, If you want to play Crysis multiplayer I suggest getting a PC and playing Crysis and Crysis Wars :)
Said this the other day, the PS3 demo just like the PC demo was ported.
Don't judge the full game based on a 360 demo port.
This goes for PC and PS3 games.
Start b!tching and blowing your roof off if the release version is like that.
@ The_Science_Guy
Crysis 2 multiplayer is turd, re-skinned Call of Duty as you have correctly said.
Would not recommend for multiplayer unless it is modded to suppor...
Well just like the PC demo its a 360 port.
So don't rush in thinking this is the PS3 version.
Also like Cevat Yerli has said in the past
To achieve maximum visuals you need at least:
1GB System memory
1GB Video memory
PS3 on has 25% of each.
The reason why PS3 1st party games look so great is because everything from how the maps are design and to how the levels pan out has been structured so that t...
Yep would highly recommend
Would swap out GTX 550 with one of the following
GTX 460, GTX 560, HD 6870, HD 6950
GTX 460 would be the best choice for: power, heat, performance and cost reasons.
Thing is AndyB is wrong
GTX 550 has 192(CCs), 32(TMUs)and 24(ROPs)
GTX 460 has 336(CCs), 56(TMUs)and 32(ROPs)
GTX 560 has 384(CCs), 64(TMUs)and 32(ROPs)
(Engine/Shader/Memory)
GTX 550 is at stock: 900MHz/1800MHz/4104MHz with 192bit interface
GTX 460 is at stock: 675MHz/1350MHz/3600MHz with 256bit interface
GTX 560 is at stock: 822MHz/1644MHz/4008MHz with 256bit interface
The GTX 560 has double the Cuda ...
Well considering you never get a game on either platform at 1920 by 1080 with AA @ 60FPS Vsync I would say the consoles are already maxed out.
Yeah Kane & Lynch are fun but compared to their previous work just shockingly horrific.
Mini Ninjas was a disaster also.
Hitman 5 this year would be insane and would easily challenge my most anticipated games Skyrim and Arkham City.
Contrary to what PS3 fanboys think the 360 GPU is better than the PS3 GPU
The only reason why 1 party games are look great on PS3 generally speaking is because of the CPU.
The Cell is about 1/3 - 1/2 better than the Xenon in computation power.
Also most games are made on DirectX and not OpenGL, this gives the Xbox another advantage in 3rd party games.
Ether the developer makes a OpenGL version or just ports it.
Every game on consoles should be mandatory install, loading screens are jokes.
Remember watching my bro play Fallout 3 on PS3, it would take him about 3-4mins from booting the PS3 to actually playing the game. Plus is was like 30mins loading screen even door he went through.
When I play Fallout 3 on my PC, I can cold boot Windows off the SSD is less than 30secs after POST, and got in game within another 30secs, if it was not for the splash screens it would be...
First game was amazing
Completed on PS3 with Platinum
Completed on PC GfWL with 1000G
Completed on PC GfWL with 1000G (GoTY version)
Can't wait to play this in 3D with PhysX
Batman Arkham Asylum was just insane at 1920 by 1080, 4xAA, 16xAF, 3D Vision and PhysX
It will not be 32nm
GPUs will be at 28nm by the end of 2011 (AMD/Nvidia)
CPUs will be at 22nm by the end of 2012 (Intel)
By the time PS4 will be out AMD, Intel and Nvidia will be at 16nm