What's the betting that all these " same old games. Not next Gen " are purchasers of COD and Halo every single time?
Amazes me that gamers know so little about what they are looking at. I'm not a graphics tech guy but KZ had a lot of next Gen touches. Re-watch Drive club, the environments looks well beyond GT.
Read Digital Foundry analysis of KZ
22 years? Is that all?
Were all 22 spent as a troll? or are you a masochist?
Idiot. If new consoles don't excite and the possibility of new games, you have the wrong hobby.
When has any hardware Gen not delivered exciting new types of game and more polish versions of what has gone before? Go and take up fishing.
I love everyone says the analogue sticks are like 360 ones. Actually they are like the ps1 first analogue pad
The size is closer to that pad too.
Anyone that knows me will hear about..........a lot about it ;-)
Evolution game will be new street racer( with top PGR guys there). New IP. MM game will be new IP. Guerilla may be KZ4 or new IP. Sumo Digital may be making LBP3.
E3 will have Infamous 3( or new IP from Sucker Punch). It will demo amazing physics and UC4 will be shown.These are my guesses.
Ps1 had the best L2/R2. Big sturdy buttons.
Why does everyone love offset?
Humans are not asymmetric in control. Most controls designed for us are balanced not offset.
It is not the same as Wii U. It will use one screen. Its more of a laptop style mouse pad . It could be useful and add some control options without daft 2 screen balls and huge added cost
Other thing about Eye tech is it always cheap tech
They won't make it primary. Probably more for video chat and just add on functionality. MS wants Kinect to be primary and it costs a lot of money. Problem is, voice control and waving your arms , is just not fun compared to a proper controller.
I think that much is now pretty obvious
Unlike Kinect, its cheaper tech
Eye toy has always been cheap.
Bonus of that is you don't have to bet the farm on it. MS pushed Kinect because it was expensive.
Even if Eye toy/ Kinect 2 work as advertised, voice and waving arms are just not that engaging to players. Novelty nonsense.
There still seems to be some confusion for some.
With PS+ you do not keep the "free" games if you lapse in subs(like all other subscription services-Netflix,Spotify etc) but you keep anything you bought discounted. Any money at all spent and it remains yours.
PS+ is fantastic and owning both systems makes it a crazy deal.
Only the lightest of users won't benefit from it and save money.
I couldn't care less. Played 1 or 2 ps2 on my ps3 for 5 min.
I'll still have a ps3 in the house.
PSN games may be possible as they are built on Sony Pyre(??) Engine ( on something like that) and its a free multi platform engine that Sony provided
I'm going back to PS only next Gen. I got my 360 first because I couldn't wait 16 months for PS3.
Loved L4D and like Gears but PS3 offered so much more varied games.
L4D won't be 360 exclusive if another is made and I don't like Halo.
The Wii was the worst console I've ever owned.
I'll be a one console guy again and happy for it.
Why sad? Could be worse, could have grown men playing games for babies
And you, as a gamer, should be sad about it
Best handheld hardware ever made. Needs key games.
Sony should try and get Mine craft etc on it.
They patented a design like this in 2009.
If it is Vita like with added triggers, I'd be happy. Vita is fantastic for controls.
Or a Vita?? That came out first
Tell that to Infamous 2 and it's world breaking water splash graphics. Love that game but everytime an object hit water it was like PS1 has popped in for a visit.
Second Son looks considerably better and I2 looked good in general.