Waterboy is stubborn, I would try not to even bother replying to him.
"dont really get the point of 1080p
ps3s 720 p looks better than any 1080 p ive seen"
Yes, he said that. He also said a long time ago that PC only looks good because it's running on a small screen and PS3 is stronger because it's on a big screen. He doesn't understand resolution...
If you can survive an early rush (6 pool, cannon rush), the enemy player will be so far behind economically it's not even funny. You can literally steamroll him right after.
As for people who mass armies of one type (void rays, mutalisks), scout it before hand and mass the counter for it. See a turtling Protoss massing void rays? Mass vikings/mutalisks and hydras, and kite the void rays so they can't fully charge. Chances are they won't have a ground army either, ...
Good luck multitasking with Move. Hotkeys are an essential part of the game, allowing things like managing your base without even looking at it and focusing on a fight.
It's so funny how the driver looks in the 3rd person cam, lol
"dont really get the point of 1080p
ps3s 720 p looks better than any 1080 p ive seen"
This is the same guy that thought framerate had to do with screen size and not resolution...
720p is 720p no matter what. Even if you had 16xAA, it still wouldn't look as good as 1080p. *sigh* how can I put this in a way you'd understand... PS3 doesn't have magical cell fairies that enhance sharpness and jaggies.
The reason people like EA now has alot more to do with Mirror's Edge and Dead Space than their PS3 favoring.
Umm stick CD in computer, install, play. Same as Crysis 1. And it doesn't take a $1000 PC to play.
The original BARELY hit 30fps all medium with a 7800 at 720p. You guys are lucky it even looks this good. What were you guys really expecting? Almost every big console game runs at 720p 30fps.
Be happy it's V-synced.
More like unless you're running on anything below an 8800GTX. Which is like, 3 years old. It doesn't take a $1000 PC.
Lmao... even if it did overshadow it (which it won't), the PC Valve fanbase is massive to the point where it wouldn't matter if nobody bought it on PS3 or 360.
It's not about demanding graphics, even integrated laptop cards run Starcraft 2 at low. It's about the gameplay itself, it would be extremely dumbed down to the point where it wouldn't really be enjoyable. Both Diablo and Starcraft are very fast paced games that take full use of keyboard/mouse to keep up with the game speed. Controllers/move really wouldn't keep up.
"ever heard of starcraft 64???? but i can imagine a starcraft 2 port with the Move controler, im sure it would work."
If they insanely slowed down the game. Since would be no way to implement things like hotkeys, shift queuing, micromanaging units (you need quick reflexes and perfect accuracy). Things like building units at your base using hotkeys while micromanaging units in a fight (pulling back injured ones before they die) and queuing units to preform their spec...
"race modifications will be included but not for all cars."
I'm not sure I get this. Race modifications? I guess it's a premium thing?
"Resistance 2 runs at 30 FPS."
Thanks, I haven't played it so I didn't know. I remembered Insomiac stating RnC:ACiT as being their last 60fps game, so I guessed that Resistance 2 might have been.
"Metal Gear Rising will NOT look better than MGS4 that is for damn sure, an EXCLUSIVE"
Download the HD trailer from the Japanese PSN store (find a guide for navigation, since it's a pain). It clearly runs at 60fps, wit...
"Metro 2033, a multiplat, looks better than Resistance, an exclusive."
360 version looks decent (judging from some pictures I saw), and you're comparing to a launch title. I have the PC version though, it honestly look on par with Crysis. But that's PC, really unfair.
"Gears of War, a multiplat, looks better than Demon's Souls, an exclusive."
Different kind of game. Try Uncharted.
"Mass Ef...
Mmm, the multiplayer trailer looked nearly exactly like Killzone 2s graphics with a more stable framerate. The only thing really better is the textures, which are a LOT sharper now. I think the color palette from the snow level is what made it seem to look ALOT better, but when we see Killzone 2 style areas (ala, the multiplayer trailer), it just looks way too similar to Killzone 2.
"combined with the wealth of available paid downloadable content "
...
"paid"
Shove it in our faces Microsoft. Seriously, that's the last thing you would ever want to brag about.
"And the original Mass Effect is absolutely an Xbox 360 exclusive, making Xbox 360 the only place to get the full Mass Effect experience,"
*looks at PC box*
Umm, the original is on PC too. With better graphics...
Resistance 3: Left 2 Die.
.....
jk jk, but the teaser does hint towards a co-op survival game.
Mmm, over at the Gamefaqs forums, there are over 10 topics every day of just people buying graphics cards or building computers for this game.
I just noticed something that I seriously don't get... the F1 and the GT5 cars are going at the EXACT same speed at certain parts of the videos, and yet the actual speed is extremely different.