So what you are basically saying is that James Bond is shit? Since everyone is always expecting him?
I know they both use the same switches, but the actual keys are made of cheap feeling plastic on the K60 but on the K90 they have a nice rubbery feel.
I dunno I was just disappointed by it but the K90 was nicer.
Personally I have a SideWinder X4 and cant see any reason to upgrade, I love it.
My friend just got this and I really didn't like it. It feels really cheap, the keys are very cheap plastic and tbh it is butt ugly when you see it for real.
However, my brother has the K90 and it's a different beast all together, still not pretty imho but far better quality looking and feeling than the K60.
I have the game and it is pretty good imho. No it aint great but it most definitely is not as bad as these idiot reviews are making out. It's like some sad competition to see who can give it the lowest score! imho it's a 7/10 game, no lower than that.
There are plenty of games out there that still run on the Doom 3 engine anyway (ID Tech 4). And one rather notable game that runs on it's predecessor! (COD btw, it runs on the Quake 3 engine, the one before the DOOM 3 engine)
It's still a more than capable engine, better than a lot of stuff released a lot more recently.
I got a refund into my wallet when I bought Escape Plan and it was the wrong price. I didn't even think about it or ask for it, it just turned up a week or so after I bought it.
@RedDead
Nah that was ITV not the BBC.
Vapourware, that's what agent is.
Yeah the first KZ was definitely an fps, the second Killzone, Killzone Liberation wasn't an fps.
I wholeheartedly agree with the winner. I honestly have never been so on edge playing a game it is a genuine nerve shredder. I'd actually say it is a frickin horrible experience! In a good way :S
What you on about? As a true fan of the original KillZone you would know that the second already veered pretty far off what the original did.
I'd still say the original is the best of the series. But I also very much liked 3.
The first game had so much more depth than 2 and 3, a far better story and multiple playable characters too.
On the multiplayer side, yes 3 was a step back from 2, and tbh I'd say graphically too. But on the whole I like...
Personally I thought it was crap, glad I got it free and didn't pay for it.
I would add BladeRunner, which practically invented cyber punk and Aliens, which practically invented space marines.
Who's complaining? When this was first rumoured I thought "this better be exactly like SSB but with PlayStation characters!" So tbh I couldn't be happier! I love SSB and I love some PlayStation characters. This is officially top of my most wanted list right now.
Me and a few friends get together on the last Sunday of every month for a gaming night. The past few we've been playing Worms it's a barrel of lols I tell thee.
I recommend everyone have at least one night a month where instead of playing online you actually get together in a room with your friends and play some local multiplayer :)
What's the point in that when you can get a far better monitor for half the price, or less!
Actually I'd say GOW3 looks better than UC3. Maybe just my opinion but either way there isn't much in it.
Wouldn't take a broken pay cheque home to her that's for sure!
I personally didn't like it not because it wasn't serious enough or anything, I love a bit of stupid in my games, just that I didn't like the gameplay. I also felt that it was trying too hard to be funny and most of the time it wasn't, it was just immature penis jokes.
LA Noire, I just didn't get the good revies that game got? I played about 2 hours and turned it off. The much lauded facial nonsense looked terrible! The faces looked bizarrely stuck onto bo...
It's got a good story and excellent atmosphere, but the gameplay is too weak to be enjoyable imho.