Only on the internet buddy. Most of the people I know have totally enjoyed GTAIV and think it's a great game.
So was The Lost and Damned. Can't wait to play this when I pick it up tomorrow.
Morgan has some nice tits even if they are a bit lopsided but in this case she doesn't know tit. Mario Galaxy is not for kids. It's a game for everyone and I'm not embarrassed having played the sh*t out of it and still consider it one of the best games this gen.
" . . . the content is defently just a timed deal."
Right, I really want to trust someone who can't spell definitely? Besides, Jeronimo Barrera, Community Manager at Rockstar claimed they were done with DLC.
Sounds like it's going to be fantastic. Glad I put my faith in the second and didn't write it off as most did.
I'll just wait for Digital Foundry's face off comparison.
So I guess they're done with DLC. Lost and Damned was better than GTAIV but I think it's because it was more condensed. GTAIV seemed to go on forever and sort of wore out its welcome.
I was gonna get a new Elite since I have the orginal 20 GB models but I think I'll wait for the retail release of the 250 GB SKUs. I know they're available in limited editions such as the Forza 3 and Modern Warfare 2 bundles now but you know they'll be replacing the 120 GB SKUs soon.
It did bomb. The movie was pretty horrible.
This is how you generate 440 million in revenue in 1 month, show a profit for the first quarter of the fiscal year in a recession and be the only console with a year over year increase in sales. You kids don't really know anything about anything do you?
Halo 3 is not easy. Call of Duty and Battlefield are much easier and more accessible. I don't know why people think that.
Agreed. I've put aside a small savings for the games in November alone. Modern Warfare 2, Assassins Creed 2 and Left 4 Dead 2. I'm picking up Episodes from Liberty City tomorrow and bought Forza 3 yesterday. Got Uncharted 2 2 weeks ago and will be picking up Ratchet and Clank Future this weekend. Bought a Boy and his Blob last week and will be picking up New Super Mario Bros. Wii next month. Damn, that's a lot of games.
It did. A demo was released for the first on the XBox 360 weeks before the game was released.
300,000 people online playing Halo 3 daily. I don't know how the game has managed to maintain that following. I play Modern Warfare and World at War and combined both games don't usually have as many players online unless a map pack has been released or it's double XP.
On shaky ground? 440 million in revenue in the month of September. Case closed. Games don't make a console successful, revenue does. Fanboys hate it but it IS all about sales and if you don't believe that, ask the Dreamcast how all those great games and tech worked out for it.
Yeah, they do look like those 90's boy bands like Take That or one of those bands. LOL.
At least I'm not the only one enjoying Halo haters and PS3 fanboys heads collectively explode at the positive reviews. Their only defense has been to compare an expansion built by a small team in a little over a year on a dated engine to one of the PS3's flagship titles developed with a rebuilt engine and 150 person team and a budget 5 times the size of ODST's.
It's so much fun watching the Halo haters heads explode at the flood of positive reviews for Halo: ODST.To compare Uncharted 2, a true sequel, with it's budget and rebuilt engine to Halo: ODST, an expansion built on a dated engine by a small team for fans of the franchise shows how desperate PS3 fanboys are to have this game fail. You guys are ridiculous.
Halo: ODST has more content that Infamous. Hell, it has more content than most retail games released this generation. Critics and fanboys alike need to get over themselves. Had it not been for Microsoft announcing the game would be a moderately price expansion before the full scope of the title was realised you would not ncomplaints about the games price and value and you may have seen even higher review scores because that seems to be the biggest complaint.
Who cares? O_o
Edit @ Caffo01
There is no standardized criteria for reviewing games. A review is really based on a reviewer's experience with that game. A second person may not have enjoyed it as much and given it a lower score while another reviewer enjoyed his experiences so much he overlooks a game's flaws and scores it higher. I really hate that people read so much into review scores. That's the reason so many games are looked at as being overrated in retrosp...