No it's not confirmed, it actually says 4 player co-op on the official page. The article did not even link to a source.
It also says "100% destructible multiplayer arena".
You're right it does say 4 player, but most people will just see this headline and go with it. It's not even an article, just a paragraph stating an assumption without linking any sources.
https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...
That makes sense actually, I just hadn't heard much about this feature.
Imagine it coming with a Halo 6 beta, now that would be a throwback!
Is this really a big deal? The game looks incredible graphics wise, while games like BO4 look 5 years old.
It was amazing! And so refreshing. It wasn't released as a full game and more of an expansion, which is why it's often hard to compare it to other Halo games.
MS really should have used this year to release ODST 2 as a side project. There hasn't been a traditional Halo game since 2015, and with Halo infinite not even looking likely for next year the drought is way too fkn long.
"awe-inspiring in the full extent of its incompetence."
lmao
While i hope this doesn't negatively affect blameless employee, it's a very important indication that word of mouth can make a change sometimes. This is why I'll always be ok with criticizing COD as long as it gives me reason to.
Honestly I think it just might work for them. I'm not too interested in this game but Destiny was able to retain its fanbase even when Bungie screwed them over, so Bioware may be able to benefit from the same formula.
That's not the problem people are pointing out. They certainly understand the market and are free to make a mobile game. The problem was with them misunderstanding that their community would be as excited about a mobile game as they would about a proper sequel, and using hype for the latter to promote the former on such a large platform. It's either them not understanding or just them being sleazy and intentionally creating false hype to get as much publicity as possible. Either way i...
"Isn't that the point of video games?"
Uh yea but it's not the only point, that's very narrow minded. It can always be more fun. Going by just the "fun" logic we never would've progressed past the super mario games on Super Nintendo because they are still fun to this day. By that logic they don't even need regular MP and zombies anymore, next game can just be Blackout mode for $70, because hey it's fun right?
Ju...
Lol can't believe idiots defend this bare bones game. Yea it's a fun, COD gameplay has always been fun, but that doesn't justify its price, lack of improvement in graphics or engine, and now MTs.
I'm absolutely amazed at the game but i agree with that too.
Because it's fuckin amazing. Every highly rated game gets these.
Coool it actually does look like FEAR. The death animations and physics are reminiscent.
They're both shit. Playstation classic is $130 here in Canada, Jesus $130 for 20 games that are 20 year old that you could probably play on your cellphones. For another $70 you can get a PS4 ffs.
Man where is L4D 3 :(
This is awesome though.
Dman wow!
To be fair he's he seem to be referring to best written review. You don't need to play the game to appreciate good writing.
Yes exactly. People defend Destiny 2 by stating that Forsaken is good, but that's not the point. I'm sure it's good, but it costs almost as much as a full game, PLUS you need to have the base game. It's a blatant way to earn the revenue of a full price game just a year after release, and still looks like Destiny 1, for a bit more you could get a full game.