No. Zombie mode was the only thing in WaW that wasn't a pile of shit. Everything MW2 did wrong WaW did worse.
The more powerful a nations peoples feel, the less they feel the need to respect other nations. Hitler had everyone convinced Germany was the greatest nation in existance so people didn't see why they should respect others. A lot of Americans nowadays think because they are American they are untouchable and all powerful. Same principle as why its OK for us to kill and eat animals. They're percieved to be below us.
Would be better set in London IMO
Exactly what i thought. No doubt acti will release £200 worth of dlc and expansions to go with it.
Was going to say the say but you beat me to it.
If they just spent more than a monday lunchtime making the maps then they might be ok.
Quality wise its like flogging a dead horse. IW have jumped ship and considering they were the best devs at acti, just imagine what their less skilled comrades will do.
I think the same. Its an extremely unbalanced CoD4 with crap maps and slightly shinier graphics.
The auto aim is very noticable when sniping. Someone runs past the guy your aiming at and your scope gets pulled away after him. Or quick scoping. Without auto aim it would be harder.
The thing that really annoys me is when you shoot at the same time as someone else and your bellets won't hit, even though your aiming at them. Or sometimes if I shoot first and it knocks their guns aim onto my head and I die.
Might have catered to noobs but it was still an amazing game. One of my favourite FPS ever.
Haha, made me lol
Well i suppose they've got to add something to make it a different game to the last 217 CoD games to come out. Probs won't get it. Treyarch have no idea how to do competitive online and with MoH and Crysis 2 coming out, why would I want a MW2 clone set it Vietnam?
I really didn't like MAG. It does get better, but i'd still only class it as mediocre. Much prefer BC2 and tbh I think even MW2 is better than MAG.
Space fox
I can see where your coming from but I think BC2 was a step in the right direction. Better than BC1 imo.
Socomnick
Stones and glass houses much? Your description of BF is more apt for Socom than BC2. And what would you class as not being lazy? Releasing a bug ridden game (socom confrontation) or releasing the same game with slightly different maps (CoD series)?
Clown.
WTF? Onimusha's opening better than Onimusha 3's? This is more like a list of the only 5 games the author has played rather than the 5 best openings. What about Bioshock's opening? Or MGS4's? Or FFX's?
The only ones i agree with are CoD4 and maybe LBP. The rest were mediocre.
I will be very annoyed if you cant turn auto aim off in MP
I was concerned when i read the title, but the fact ones an MMO whilst the others a pure racing game put my mind at ease. Just have to see the quality when the games come out. Doesn't matter how milked a franchise becomes, if the games are still amazing it doesn't matter how many there are.
EA is probably the best thrid party dev, and IMO the best dev all round at the moment (for consoles.) 2K have done some good things too though (GTA and Bioshock with Red Dead to come)
With regards to the FPS on each console.
MAG wasn't that good IMO and the reviews weren't outstanding. Even Insomniac revealed they were disappointed with R2, as were many fans of the first Resistance. Killzone is very good, but it's a lot less accessable than Halo.
Yes the single player could be better, but the the Multiplayer is the reason people buy BF games.
You mean Boku?
Says a lot for Treyarchs dev skills that a tacked on feature that was a bonus rather than a percieved reason to buy the game for Acti was actually the best thing about it.