Because Activision puts CoD on EVERY single device under the sun...........this is no-brainer.
Fucking EPIC.
Always read the article and find the original quotes. Most headlines nowadays are either completely false or simply misleading.
The quote was soooooo taken out of context lol. Most people won't bother to find it though and just read the headline and take it for what it says.
"Yet you were compelled enough to click on the link and make a comment and then check for updates and reply."
Um, yes, and........?
"Obviously its still a relevant topic"
Nobody said anything about relevancy. Holy crap man you're REALLY over-thinking my comment lol.
Nah I'm just sayin, all these kinds of articles do is encourage flame bait, whether the author meant to do that or not. We can't have actual civilized discussions here on N4G when it comes to comparative articles.
Not one of these again........
Regardless of what the author says, any article with "Which is better?" in the title or anything akin to that should be automatically rejected.
How could you hate a console so much that you've never even USED or PLAYED or even BEEN AROUND? Lol this guy sounds like the typical N4G user.
Companies should really consider using some of the photoshop designs people on the internet create. They're a lot better than what the companies put out.
Ratchet & Clank, yes.
I agree that Pachter is indeed an idiot, but I must say, I enjoy his Pach Attacks. I'll give him that.
All because specs don't determine the winner doesn't mean the DON'T matter.
Read my original post, I basically stated that while they matter, they're NOT the most important thing. I never said they were everything.
Lol yeah I noticed that too. I love how he took that rumor as fact, especially considering how obviously bogus it is.
"768 MB of DRAM “embedded” with the CPU, and shared between CPU and GPU"
Anyone who knows the basics of these kinds of things knows how retarded that sentence is lol.
They matter, and any Nintendo fan who says specs DON'T MATTER is kidding themselves.
Specs DO matter. They're not EVERYTHING but strong specs certainly help out a lot.
But as the PS1 and PS2 and Wii have proven, nothing is more important than simply having a vast array of games that appeal to everyone, and features of a console can be as equally if not MORE important (CD and DVD capability, motion controls) than specs.
In the Wii U...
Tribe 2 aren't the only devs that have said this though.
THQ said LAST YEAR right after E3 that the Wii U can "do 1080p very easily" in an interview.
So this isn't the first time we've heard that.
Either that or they rather have 720p with 60 FPS for now, then do 1080p games when it's quicker and easier to work with the hardware.
The PSP has been outselling it for a bunch of weeks.
That definitely not acceptable.
3 disagrees? Anyone care to prove to me that every game this gen runs in native 720p? Lol.
You're right, EVERY Wii U game should run in native 1080p, just like every game this gen ran in native 720p, right?
Although this could be completely made up, a Monster Hunter game is highly probable actually considering the Wii got Tri and the 3DS got Tri G and Monster Hunter 4.
I would love to see the first HD Monster Hunter.