Ok...what about insomniac?Or Quantic Dreams?Or Ninja Theory?They are 3rd party and develop exclusivly for ps3...sry but MS has every right to do what they did,they bought rights,they publish it and fund project so if they canceled PC version its their call that I am happy with because more anti aliasing and resolution is not the most important thing in the world...not to say how many would pirate AW on PC,but on 360 it will sell like crazy.
Why would MS want their exclusive for PC?Why doesent Sony release theirs on PC?Is MS in debt to PC community so it has to release every major exclusive to PC?
If exclusive is released on 360 and PC,you bash MS saying they dont have exclusives,when its released only on 360 you say MS should be boycott,thats not the way to treat PC players...hypocrits...
Why the f would MS want their exclusives for PC?If its only on 360 people who want AW will buy 360,thats why exclusives are for.Why doesent Sony release their exclusives like UC2 and KZ2 on PC?Ill tell you,so that people who want to play it can must buy ps3.
Liste to me,why do you sony fanboys ALWAYS when multiplat looks worse on ps3 state that its not built to use ps3s advantage?Thats simply not true,there is no more excuses for inferior multiplats in this case FF XIII which is not port on ps3.Its simple as day,ps3s gpu is not on par with xenos,but they still use SPUS,its a lie if you think otherwise.If they dont use spus ps3 version would look much worse dont fool yourself with that crap that ps3 needs specific babying to look great...gpu in 36...
Yea sure if AW looks like Alone in Dark,then your beloved GOW III looks like Bayonetta...see what i did here?
Alan Wake is clearly a looker,up there with UC2 and KZ2,but boy SC C surprised me,lightning,textures...its looking amazing,didnt expect it too look that good.
Fable III is nice looking,good art style,very much reminds me of industrial age,but nothing technically spectacular.
No please,effect of time you could see 3 gens ago,they specifically showed flowers growing in real time,tech demo.I dont know why are you defending Ken and Sony,ps3 is great system but all Sonys systems were overhyped,remember Emotion Engine?Now again with 120 fps...dual 1080p output it was said but you said its not false that suggests you think its possible.3 times more powerful then 360 was that lie? http://www.youtube.com/watc... 8:55...ps3 is lowest common denominator.
Well the guy above me said its easy to make it good in dark tunels...well tell me how many a.i on screen has UC2!That game is linear and that is why it looks good like that and bashing halo reach for gfx is stupid because the game has more a.i on screen then all your gfx kings from 2006 together.
Ok smart guy,i will use AC1 vs Resistance 2...now,tell me which looks better?
OOOO man i didnt even read tho whole killer post.Cell code???You do know what your talking about??ND is not more technical then Crytek,yo think 3rd party gets locked spus or something?Everybody can use cell the way they want and they got their sdk so its up to devs and their knowledge to use it to limits.For example look at Resistance 2(first party) and AC2(third party) and what looks better?
I didnt say it looks like Bayonetta but rather that you kill random enemies with similar weapons and gameplay is very similar,GOW III looks miles better,its not even debatable.
But Alan Wake was in development before Alone in Dark,its also original game,its thriller not horror.And just like GOW III to Bayonetta,AW to Alone in Dark looks miles better.Its common that fanboys say that AW sucks because of having flashlight just like Alone in Dark,so i said GOW III is like Bayonetta...