All Channels
Popular

Sarcasm

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 157100

Good lord no. Maybe.

4473d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yup same here I will be skipping this.

4474d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah and GT Prologue has a bunch of re-playability

4474d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

I bought two years worth for $30 each year. Seriously the amount of free games that I've already played on it on my Vita, PS3, and PS4 it has already paid for itself and more. The next sale I'll probably buy 3-4 years worth and be good for the rest of the PS4 gen.

4475d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's a known fact, yet Xbox One owners are still in denial. So let the articles keep on coming for the rest of the generation. It never let up last generation when Xbox 360 ports were truly "slightly" better than the PS3 versions.

4475d ago 16 agree2 disagreeView comment

Ahh thanks for the clarification. Might end up just getting the PS3 version for $20 then.

4476d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

^Thank you for the polite response. I do know and agree there are some people who can't tell a difference and some don't care. But I was merely more referencing to the difference of the hardware will always push the PS4 to be the one with the best quality on multi-platform games for the same money.

4476d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I thought it was $30 for previous gen.

4476d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I'm generally with those who say if it's really good then game length doesn't matter, but come on... $40 for 2 hours really is pushing it. $30 might have been better, $20 would have been perfect.

4476d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sony never published actual CPU speeds of the PS4, 1.6ghz is all a guess by the media.

Regardless, it makes zero difference seeing as the GPU is the deciding factor for Resolution and pixel pushing power in which the PS4 is 50% more powerful.

4476d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

The biggest annoyance so far is the flip flop in the games media.

X360 has two slightly sharper textures than PS3, "X360 super vastly superior over 9000 experience, avoid the PS3 version like the plague!"

PS4 has either double the resolution or frame rate than Xbox One, "Very slight difference, nobody can tell"

/rant

4476d ago 13 agree0 disagreeView comment

Decent article that fell flat in the end with the whole hand holding "everybody is a winner" shill. Face it, as long as developers push the PS4 and don't gimp it to match the Xbox One, it will have better multi-platform games for the foreseeable future.

4476d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't understand, I thought people realize by now not to take Pachter so seriously? He just spouts random thoughts on things sometimes.

4476d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

lol the irony is insane

4476d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Tricking the hardware and tricking the consumers. But to be fair the cars do look good in that game. It's the environments that is lacking and the lack of anti-aliasing is an eye sore.

4476d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So Sony lied to us, it's not 1.5:1 it's 2:1.

4477d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I actually expected the Xbox One to do worse than this considering the price and the hardware. It's doing pretty damn good actually. It's just the PS4 is in a league of its own right now.

4477d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

It will get an easy 400-500k by Feb 22nd.

4477d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

I'm calling it here, PS4 version is 1080p while XONE is 900p.

4477d ago 51 agree4 disagreeView comment

I dunno, judging by those screens I think whoever posted it is posting the X360 version. I've seen titanfall in person because one of my brother's friend is in the beta and it looks nowhere near that bad. Before anyone thinks I'm trolling, I've been known to be more "pro-sony" so I have nothing to lie about here.

4477d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment