The graphics card is NOT comparable to a GTX 660 (A ~$200 GPU). It's comparable to a Radeon 7790 which is about $120.
This is comparing the Xbox360 version versus the PC right?
Yup, all 5 million of them which maybe 5,000 will buy this game. (Fixed)
Was just about to say that. Hipsters, contrarians, and Xbox fanboys.
Does Microsoft not realize Forza 5 being 1080p/60fps doesn't automatically bump up the resolution or frame rates on THE OTHER TITLES?
I'd rather get a Wii U than a U-yah!
I'll show myself out...
*grabs coat*
Yeah something about the driving physics doesn't look right
Wow... the BMW race video is soooooooo realistic at 1:26...
o_o
So an entire generation of X360 vs PS3 multiplat comparisons when everyone dogging on the PS3 versions "slightly worse" ports, now that the tables turned with the gap much much wider "Is there too much emphasis on resolution and frame rate?" Seriously wtf.
Some will argue that the Last of Us is a good example of that.
Get the OLED, it's one of the best things about the Vita
It's out of stock everywhere while the Xbox One is readily available. This is a worldwide phenomenon.
But, the cloud?
"But despite the inconsistency in the PS4 experience, we still feel it's the preferable buy. During combat - a key element in the game - we see the Xbox One drop down to the mid 20s, with the PS4's higher frame-rate offering a clear advantage in both smoothness and RESPONSE, despite the fluctuations - the bottom line is that the differences between 40-50fps on the PS4 are far less of an issue than, say, the 24-30fps drops incurred by the Xbox One. "
And thos...
^You're wrong.
30fps average is that, 30fps.
Say a game is 60fps, but dips to 45fps. You're telling me that it's lower than 30fps average? What kind of math are you doing?
And minimum frame times is irrelevant unless you look at frame rate over time.
And no, you can ask ANYBODY who owns a gaming PC that a game without V-Sync, while it has screen tear, is still less "laggy" than a game with 30fps and V-...
Why do I taste salt from this guy's article.
And the PS4 will be stronger than the Xbox One and obviously Wii U and will still have "all the games."
The PS2 argument doesn't work.
PS4 is
-Cheaper
-Easy to develop for
-Most Powerful
-Most 1st party Support
I'm not sure if you're reading correctly. That's quoted from Albert himself, dodging the differences between the resolutions and frame rate discrepancies on multi-platform games.
Survey says 12 year old COD fankids are disrespectful to the human race.
Honestly, that's what happens if you buy a games console with gaming as a secondary afterthought. You won't get the most polished games with the absolute highest quality you can get for your money today.
It actually all really boils down to price. If the Xbox One came out at $299, you'd expect it to perform as a $299 system in which it would actually be a STEAL to have that performance for $299. But nooooope, it's $499 and is nowhere near worth it at that pric...