samden

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 11620

Correct, but given how expensive gaming monitors are it's good to future proof. We are starting to get 4k60 [gaming] monitors and even 4k144 but the prices for 2k haven't budged :(

3210d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Fix? They have yet to fix Mei's Lunar skin even though they said they already had a fix ready to release along with the next patch, which was like 6 patches ago.

3215d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Basing decision purchases off of review scores is silly. Look at PCGamer giving Andromeda a higher score than Nier: Automata. Andromeda had broken animations, bugs galore, poor writing, poor voice acting, and fun game play. Nier had a bug that occasionally caused the mouse cursor to appear at the center of the screen, cut-scenes are locked at 30fps, and a bug causing the game to crash on AMD cards (I know many people with AMD cards who had no issues, so it's a rare bug).... It makes no se...

3215d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Cool, good for you

3215d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

.

3227d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

@wonderfulmonkey, dude, you really need to stop with the whole piracy thing. Please give me stats that 100% of people who use emulators pirate the games. Nintendo made a great game, I'll gladly pick it up from the store. But I'm going to use the emulator rather than shell out $300 for a plastic brick.

3236d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView comment

Yeah, $300+ for a single game is TOTALLY worth it. No thanks. I'll grab the game from local store and use the emulator.

3236d ago 3 agree5 disagreeView comment

Hit the nail on the head. For the past 3 generations (Wii, U, and Switch) only 3 games have garnered my interest. I'm sorry but buying the games, then paying double that amount on the required console just isn't worth it. If they were on PC or even a different console, I would buy them without hesitation. Otherwise I'm stuck not being able to enjoy Zelda because it's 85% of the appeal of a Nintendo console, for me.

3236d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Terrible article with zero validity. The author makes really poor comparisons that frankly don't even make sense, and they don't disclose where they received the information either. AND they only use 2 new games and 2 old games for comparison. Move along people, nothing worth your time here.

3238d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, being able to access the game a week early is definitely the sole reason people are talking about a game's poor animations. Seriously how do people come up with such flawed logic and actually believe it? And it's not just the animations but the god awful writing and voice acting. Sorry, my face is tired.

3241d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, I don't know why the guy didn't want the game ruined for him or story being spoiled before he got to play it. He definitely lives under a rock...

3245d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

But F**k piracy at what cost to the consumer? This sounds like a rushed implementation and look what Denuvo did to Forza: Horizon 3 and pegging CPUs because it was trying to decrypt on a single core.

3252d ago 9 agree7 disagreeView comment

@uth11, what they advertised that wasn't in the game that hyped me up was stuff like race wars and giant space battles (not just a few static freighters around each space station). The ability to choose to support a specific race in the war. It wasn't the tiny little features like sandworms that dissapointed me, it was the larger grand scheme mechanics that aren't even hinted at in the current state.

3252d ago 7 agree4 disagreeView comment

People are probably shitting on Ubi because the For Honor servers have gone down like 6 times since launch. They were down for the entirety of its second weekend.

3253d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

aaaaand here is the butt hurt user who didn't even read the review to know their reasoning behind the low score. Swooping in the trash the review to make themselves feel better.

3271d ago 6 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yeah, it's an abysmally shallow game. It's a great quality console RTS, don't get me wrong, but if you are a fan of PC RTS games then this isn't worth looking at.

3271d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

It also implies it's a better game than it actually is.

3271d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't think @morganfell or @1nsomniac realize that For Honor has had multiple closed alphas and a closed beta. The open beta was, like every other open "beta" right before release, a stress test. You seem so quick to hate without understanding/knowing what you are talking about.

3273d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The closed beta, just 2 weeks before the open beta, was complete garbage and I'm not sure if they ever even got 4v4 working by the end of it because I deleted the game. They have had networking/matchmaking issues since the very first alpha.

3273d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Fully optimized? It's over 3 years old and I cannot run max settings and get a solid 60fps on a GTX 970. And even on an SSD the loading screens are GARBAGE!!!

3280d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment