totally agree!!! The first one was a masterbpiece, this one will be too.
I think turgore means compared with the pc version.
I have a xbox360 and a 4 year old pc, and 'im getting it for my pc. It's better in every way on the PC (PS3included)
The Course Maker sounds cool, b-spec rather boring if you ask me.
Maybe you can compare it with other (sport)managers, but still, giving an AI pilot to "step on the gas, dumbass!!!" doesn't quiet do it for me...
This game beats GTA in every way! clearly you haven't played the first Mafia (on pc) or you would know better.
Buy this game on the pc and you will love it garanteed!!
what you say is true (according to the story's from E3 about the 3Ds)
but don't you always look straight at the screen with a handheld??
If this technologie would find itself to TV's, I'm pretty sure the view angle will be a lot better.
One of the early LCD screens got a blurry like image when viewed on certain angles. Today this issue is as good as gone. I'm confident it will go the same way for 3D without the glasses, in the very near...
3D without glasses is the way to go. Bying a 3D TV wich needs glasses is a waste of money.
I'm not talking about the differences witch there are off course. I'm talking about the fact that the chances of MS making the online feature free were very slim, even when Sony offers most of them for free. But now that Sony also comes up with charging money for some online features, MS will surely not change their strategy about online play.
Simply said; Sony followed a bit what MS is doing and not vice versa.
To bad tho, I would prefered the other way around :)
if Sony wasn't coming with a payable service. And now that they do, MS has no reason to stop charging money as they do now.
maybe, but even professional (real life) drivers can barely do this.
And real rally cars have better lights mounted on the hood.
But hey, pull it off flawlessly and you got yourself a nice movie for youtube :)
looked horrible, you can barely see the road. How are you supposed to race on that?
"Sony blew everyone away with thier exclusives just like they always do"
agreed (mostly) but you got my idea wrong. Nintendo doesn't focus on that part of gaming anymore. Nintendo can't compete with the console power of PS3 and X360, so why should they bother? They putted motion controls on the map, slapping both Sony and MS in the face (sales wise that is...)
and I'm pretty sure they will do it again with the 3Ds and 3D for gaming.
...
well, disgree all you want, as far as the show went, Nintendo beats both Sony and MS with the 3Ds.
3D for games will be the next step, but wearing glasses for it is a dead end technology. Think about it.
As for games, Sony had a better show than MS, especially comparing Move vs Kinect.
All in all, 2010 is already one of the best gaming years since long and we're only half way :)
sell PS3's, yes but 3D tv's and Move? I don't think so. Don't get me wrong, 3D for a racing game will be very very cool, but I think most people won't throw out there TV's just to get a 3D one for a game.
This whole 3D stuff is very premature, most will wait and see how things develope.
As for Move, please be kidding! You don't play a racing game with a wand, especially not a simulator. Get a racing wheel!! I don't even know why PD implements...
mafia 2 for PC
it looks good! I don't need some numbers to tell me.
each for his/her own, but I don't understand how people can pay for this stuff.
sorry to burst your bubble, but there is nothing new with 3D, I played 3D games on my 8bit sega master system in the old days, so I guess sega was 30 years ahead of it's time??
Now 3D gets common in theathers, this whole thing gets so hyped, like is the new best thing around...
Sorry, but as long I have to wear glasses for 3D, I'll pass.
best racing sim ever? maybe.
best game ever? sorry, but not by a long shot.
it makes choosing a graphics card rather hard; do I buy one now, wich is DX11 compatible, even when there aren't a lot of games supporting it and by the time they do, the card itself gets mid-end? Or do I wait for the next generation while the rest of my PC gets mid-range...
I love gaming on PC but it can suck at making the right choice whithout having to spend a huge amount of money. I don't wanna buy a new high-end PC each year.
I play on a E6600 dual @ 3Ghz, 4GB Ram, Win7 64bit, 8800gts (640Mb)
Res: 1080p, no AA, no Vsync, 16xAF, no PhysX, textures and stuff on max.
Runs smoothly and looks gorgeous!!