sagapo

Member
CRank: 5Score: 82950

I can agree that releasing this over Series S would have made more sense, but nothing wrong with the price imo: no disc but 2TB SSD instead of 1TB with SeriesX.

911d ago 1 agree8 disagreeView comment

Nice to have a 2TB SSD.

911d ago 10 agree5 disagreeView comment

Anast, for the love of god, just let it go 😂

914d ago 8 agree3 disagreeView comment

Might be a TV setting that gives the problem. Like dynamic colors, sharpness setting to high,… stuff like that. Try to turn all those TV processing settings off.

914d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Doesn’t happen much but this I can agree with you. A complete new engine would have worked well for this game considering the tech (hardware) available today. Surely the amount of loading (screens) would be far less for example. And who knows 60fps.

915d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Partially agreed: SeriesX gets hold back by SeriesS in terms of features (parity), not graphics.
But I believe MS already stated that the SeriesX was their pro model and there was no need for an upgraded version.
(Which makes me wonder what MS would do if PS came with a pro version 🤔)
I guess we rather see slim models appear than pro models tho imo.

917d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I believe the price vs the gain with a pro model ain’t worth it if you already own a base model.

917d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ Raul : indeed, 84 now. Still, it’s not dropping like a stone. Even if it’s final score is 80, does that make it a bad game?

917d ago 6 agree4 disagreeView comment

Revealed so far: (not final as far as I know…)
Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya
Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps
Eaglerock Speedway
Grand Oak Raceway
Hakone Circuit
Homestead-Miami Speedway
Indianapolis Motor Speedway
Kyalami Grand Prix Circuit
Le Mans - Circuit International de la Sarthe
Lime Rock
Maple Valley
Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course
Mugello Circuit
Nürburgring ...

917d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Anast, at basicly every post about Starfield, you bitch about it, taking the low scores as truth while you haven’t even played one minute. Play the game, then and only then you can give a fair opinion about it. So did you play it?

917d ago 13 agree16 disagreeView comment

Lol, like a stone… it’s still 85 on meta after 63 reviews and 87 after 127 on Open Critic.
Just give it up already, you’re making a fool of yourself.

917d ago 15 agree34 disagreeView comment

Maybe now (depending on personal preference to what you look for in these type of games) but definitely not compared with launch NMS,

921d ago 3 agree14 disagreeView comment

True, but it didn’t have whole planets to explore. There were boundaries as well when driving Mako.

922d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

I liked it. Nice graphics, story and quests were ok. It just lacked some depth to build your character imo.

925d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, DF mentions the abundance of loading screens/hick ups as well in their tech review. They might patch it out later, dunno.

928d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Elite Dangerous but haven’t played it myself.

929d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

@Rocket: true, funny you mention flying to the sun, I tried it, didn’t work 😂
Haven’t played Elite or Star Citizen tho.

929d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

You didn’t play NMS at launch did you? NMS is great now but sucked when released although the flying from planet to planet was and still is awesome. That and the VR mode!

929d ago 7 agree4 disagreeView comment

ME trilogy was great, Andromeda not so much, didn’t feel like a Bioware game.

929d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ anast: if you want to give a game a score, make sure you played it yourself. Now you act like a pathetic fanboy.

929d ago 3 agree9 disagreeView comment