For a console that costs £450 they should have squeezed in 1TB HDD, even that is hardly state of the art. 500GB is just nothing really
Honestly don't think I could narrow it down to 3, it would take too much deliberation as there have been many great games.
What a stupid article again ... PC is an open system so of course there will be graphical enhancement options surpassing consoles settings. Both versions will look awesome and great, if you have a good PC you can squeeze out some additional visual goodness.
Have been holding off purchasing a 290 until the custom cooled boards come out. Difference in temperature is phenomenal. Stock 5970 used to run over 100'C and even stock 5770 at 80'C +. Custom cooled Sapphire 6950 on full load runs at 57'C. for me your talking 40'C difference between stock and custom cooled boards. Still will be interesting to see how cool they can get this to run.
@decrypt
A Fine point.
I bought my first PC rig 3 years ago and its in need of an upgrade. Most core parts are staying. Just changing MOBO, RAM and CPU and maybe GPU.
Can't fault the ease of consoles though hence why I will more than likely get a PS4 too. Although more involved/time consuming I do agree PC is cheaper long term.
Holding out on upgrading/getting PS4 until March ish next year though. Want to see where things are at that point...
Outlast £5.09 on Steam, early mini Christmas treat I reckon ...
@Hakoom
With respect your wrong, A $400 PC will not beat a PS4 no - but a $700 would. $800-900 would be comfortable. I think for what you get for $400 PS4 is great but just pointing out your $3000 figure is complete nonsense.
@Robinkb
Yes PS4 will outperform your average PC but not high end I'm afraid.
Yes if you lined up a console against a PC that have the same specs you will get more out of the console, especially with the new archite...
In places Bioshock isn't always incredible but in the areas that it is it exceeds anything in KZSF. The photo that Andrew posted is one particular scene I remember and also just as you enter columbia at the beginning through the gardens, just amazing visuals. Sucks you straight into the game world.
Congrats R*, your business strategy worked on me, you got a PS3 copy out of me and will also get a PC or PS4 copy. Hat's off to maximizing profits guys
In my opinion Bioshock infinite maxed out (even on High to be honest) does look better than KZSF. No disservice to KZSF its a great looking game.
Exciting times
Check the system requirements of this game below.
It should be able to run at 60fps at 10k+ resolutions way into the future. Its an awesome game and does looks good but c'mon its not a surprise.
OS: Windows 7 / Vista / XP
Processor: 2.0 GHz CPU (Dual Core recommended)
Memory: 1 GB
Hard Disk Space: 2.5 GB
Video Card: ATi Radeon HD 2400 or NVIDIA GeForce 7600 or better (Shader Model 3.0 needs to be supported)
DirectX...
Also if all devs had this attitude then it wouldn't do PC gamers argument of PC gaming being cheaper than console any good. We'll just whack out another £250 on a GPU for a game like this which shouldn't require such as GPU so you don't have to bother optimising. All AC games have been terrible PC ports, hell I can barely run AC1 above 40fps on a 2gb 6950 lol!
poor attitude
It will be a visually enhanced version with all content. This game was a completely different experience on PC. Those who don't game on PC's deserve to experience this on console.
Unless it's confirming the PC release date, I couldn't give a monkeys
@ Grizzli
Get an R9 290X for less than half the price and it outperforms the titan and 780ti. Just helping you save money bro.
http://www.techspot.com/rev...
@Buckley - I agree, and that's my point, the fact that we have a fanboy fanfare that we need to quell if you will. Have no issues with the article at all.
It is the need for the article in the first place that I am having a pop at not the articles outcome.
I know it was the Beta, but even that was more broken than it should have been