Of course the game will be available on the PC, PS4 and Xbone. I'm pretty sure they were gutted by the limitations of last gen.
Other than that, i hope they don't use Emily as the new character. It just wouldn't make sense to do so, as it's completely unlike her. I would suggest to take this with a truck of salt, simply because of that alone.
The Tyvia rumour was reported on quite some time ago, but i hope they don't shoehorn some stupid ...
Coming from Gamingbolt, i wouldn't be surprised if it's to spin controversy. They're not exactly one of the best sources.
If only they had just stuck with the PC market, instead of the political boxes as well.
Bethesda makes RPG's? I thought they only made Action / Exploration games.
Principles on N4G? That has to be the first time i've heard of that.
This just makes me wish that CDPR didn't develop it for multiple platforms. They would've had much more time for improving the game.
I think this is something people won't ever understand. It's not like CDPR is the devil here, and Sony could've done the exact same thing with something similar. It's tough for the PS fans, because Sony doesn't have that same interest in Witcher 3.
Mass Effect 3 had much deeper problems than the ending, and so did ME2. How people still haven't realized this, i don't know.
I would probably be upset, if they pulled a character behind a paywall like Bioware did, but this is quite a minor issue.
Yeah, when it comes to complaining about irrelevant things, this takes the cake. Whatever physical content they include, it'll always just end up gathering dust.
Since you didn't like the first two games, i very much doubt you will suddenly love the 3rd game. It seems like you're trying to start a fire, where there isn't one to begin with.
People are getting exactly the same game, except for some physical fluff that'll be irrelevant shortly after. It would be understandable, if they were offering in-game advantages.
I could say good riddance, because of less misinformation when the game releases, but C...
You're confused, but that's understandable. The exclusive deals comment was related to in-game content, nothing else. Besides, it seems like MS paid for these extras themselves.
With the direction the industry is heading, it's almost the point of them being the killers.
And this just cements why i've been avoiding Ubisoft titles ever since Brotherhood. they simply can't get enough money out of people, so they find more ways to cash in.
They just can't go under fast enough.
I would definitely say, that CDPR is future proofing The Witcher 3 for a long time. Not to mention they're using the experience in Cyberpunk 2077 as well.
The move to make more remasters / remakes is getting close to the movie industry. Why should people buy the first version, if there are definitive editions later on?
I'm on the other side of this, because there are simply not enough games that are worth my time. Either it's because of a publisher's business practices or otherwise.
So i'm kinda bored as it is, before games like Witcher 3 releases.
I believe it was already dismissed as cannon.
This reaction was expected on N4G, but some people just won't realize that the companies aren't different in that area.
Seems like someone angered the main base of operations. It was a poor move by Squeenix, and i'm just not going to support them at all. It's not like their games have been fantastic in last generation, because they had trouble catching up with HD.
Seems like they insist on shooting themselves in the foot with this.
I hope they learned from the first game, that Daud had better character development than Corvo did. The voice of a character can make or break a game as well.