He shouldn't have even apologized. I swear people are getting more hateful and retarded every minute. There's no common sense anymore. Everyone just bashes everyone. Well, I'm jumping on the bandwagon just to say that those idiots who nitpick over every single fucking thing can just go roll over in shit and die stuffing it in their throats. Whoops, I can hear the police coming..
It looks absolutely different, more on the lines of Tomb Raider Underworld 2 than the Tomb Raider we got. However, Lara looks more skilled in the video so I'm guessing they completely scrapped the idea and started anew. This could be the foundation for the next title though, with the power the next-gen consoles provide it would be very doable.
Why didn't someone shoot this guy already?
They've overdone it with absurdity. I have finished SR2 with my friend and enjoyed it thoroughly. SR3, not so much. Too much absurdity can hurt. I don't even have a pinch of interest in SR4.
Eh, I have a feeling this will be what Bad Company 2 was to Bad Company - same weapons as BC1, same animations, updated engine and more polished gameplay. It could be better than BF3, but I don't think it will be all too different.
What? This is some grade A bullshit journalism has come to.
I don't understand how the drivers aren't on the manufacturer's website but are on some random website. I'll try downloading 'em, but I seriously doubt they're appropriate for my 460. Even Nvidia Update can't find a newer driver than 314.07.
EDIT: Guess I was wrong, they work. Although I have no clue what improvements in what games I can expect.
Correction: This is a driver for the GTX 600 series cards. The newest driver for the GTX400/500 series is still 314.07.
I will not get suckered into this so easily I'm afraid. AC1, AC2 were perfect, ACB and ACR were good, AC3 just sucked balls and at that point I lost almost all interest in the series. Every time they hyped me up with a CGI trailer, but with AC3 and ACR I was a bit let down.
This looks good, very interesting. Can't wait to try it out.
In all honesty neither version looks that distinctly better than the other except the higher resolution the PC provides. Everything else is just not significant enough of a difference. I'd take the version that plays best.
Is it just me or is Crysis 3 really that unoptimised?
Even on later levels, when outside with tons of grass the performance is relatively good (35fps on high, 1080p), considering my card is the now poor GTX 460 768MB, but then I walk inside a freaking corridor, staring at next to nothing like a wall and some ammo crates and suddenly I have 23 fps. Something's rotten in the state of Denmark.
Crysis 3 demolishes it even on medium @ 1080p..
I wish I could, but I have a crossfire-only MBO.
These new games will murder my GTX 460 I'm afraid.
Except almost every weapon from BC2 is a direct copy of the same weapon from BC1. But BC2 is still a hell of a lot more fun than BF3.
If only they could make BF4 more meaty ("heavy" as BC2 is, so it doesn't feel plastic like BF3) and fun. BC2 is hectic, but never weary. BF3 gets very dull very quickly.
If I remember, although vaguely, this GTX Titan was supposed to originally be the GTX 680, but absence of competitive product from AMD's side, nVidia was forced to relabel the then weaker chip (the to-be GTX 660 I believe) to the 680.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, I believe I read it somewhere way before the GTX 680 was to be released.
In all honesty this is a game you'll enjoy regardless of graphics. It's mindless fun!
Holy fucking shit YES if this is true.
Don't expect next-gen console games running at 60fps. Developers will always choose to pump out better graphics @ 30 fps than less shine @ 60fps. That's just how it goes. CoD will stay 60fps because that's what the series was founded on. Practically no other games are and that's perfectly fine. A stable framerate is more important. 30fps is playable and it allows developers to really bring out the shine in their games.
Want 60fps? Get a PC. That's the only...