Easy guess that there'd be a PS5 version of this one.
Yea, well,
I recalled MS mainly for the Redfall case and FO76 case, but those mainly should be pointed to Zenimax.
But I cant edit the above comment to correct that.
"It's biggest hurdle was that it followed BF1 which was better."
Although true, it was not its biggest hurdle. That'd be the fanbase.
After the initial trailer was shown, aside from the "women in ww2 and prosthetic arm" discussion, the main pushback was, why not a modern BF. 'Why after WW1, the fanbase has to play WW2?' And this push back only grew. For easy referenece, you can just refer jackfrags' videos from that time period. BF bro...
Yea that's true but still not a bad news for a start.
**Due to sudden axing of BF:V and then shipping a hero shooter-esque 2042. ~ That's the trepidation.
If EA trusted and allowed DiCE to support and expand BF:V and make it the game it was planned to be, and then skip 2042 and then ship whatever you're planning now, a year or two earlier/ago, nobody would have any of this "trepidation".
You dont trust your own work. Why would players?
And I again give the example: Bethesda, even Bethesda didnt abando...
I know. The decision was final. Hence my end statement above.
But ..... a last Red Engine endeavor still makes sense. They've got the very tech-laden/forward build ready. It outclasses most rivals. They've just gotta think of a new story, progression and world design. Instead of going all-in on UE for all 3 projects from scratch at the same time. Witcher projects can start their UE transition, CP can follow later.
There's a reason some AAA studios are sticking to...
Too early for that reveal.
Better get Wolverine update.
* Yea boi *
See Sony, EA, Ubi, MS?
Good heart-poured games are better appreciated than random live-serviced IP entry.
There's still a chance to ship the Cyberpunk sequel in Red Engine.
The 2077 build is already there, just use it to create the sequel, instead of using UE5 from scratch.
CP2077 looks better than most current gen games and is actually a current gen game, the last gen builds shouldn't even exist.
So that they can adjust the dev timeline, delay the UE5 Witcher and prepone the Red-engined-CP-sequel development and release. I know it wont happen but to me this mak...
Baldur's Gate is a Bioware developed Obsidian (previously-BlackIsle) published IP.
Dragon Age is a Bioware developed EA published IP.
(And I am talking total hands-off approach from EA. Just pure publishing.)
Trust me, this is the best combo in the world of gaming-RPG but has the slightest of slightest chance to actually happen.
"Make Dragon Age great again."
~Make Larian develop next Dragon Age for it to be great again.~
* shoot that guy(CEO) *
"Age of Empires is B-tier strategy game"
You shouldn't even be allowed to comment for a week, after that take.
* Cleans eyeballs *
Age ... Age of ... Empires on PS?
lol, wut?
Thank you!
AoE III is my favorite. Unpopular opinion, I know.
HL3 and Portal 3?
I'd buy the damn console just to support that decision (coz I won't be allowed to kiss Gabe)
"form of exclusive content to still make it worthwhile."
First off, does Steam Deck needs exclusives to survive?
And next, Steam has many PC exclusives. Its the preferred launch platform for indie devs.
Not the first time tho,
They tried before with Steam Machine.
But this time, its different.
They've already got a hit with Steam Deck. Just need to expand the model range.
Getting anounced at the SoP, nearest to you.
That got me thinking, what happened to Capcom's Pragmata? It had Kojima-esque vibes.
I appreciate Capcom revising exising IPs but it'd be cooler if they also try something different with new AAA IPs.