Nintendo should stay far far far far far away from ATLUS.
I could see a possibility of Gamestop carrying the Xbox One, but not buying back used games of Xbox One.
From what I understand, they are taking all the revenue.
it's a good game, rent it at least. Anyway don't bother with the gamespot review, points were taken off for no online multiplayer even though it didn't even have online multiplayer on the PS2 when it came out.
Just for that alone, the reviewer lost all credibility.
is it just me or am I the only one that can't see the difference between the two?
sweet, looking forward to it. I haven't played the second game but from what I hear it's way better than the first one.
WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA....There's going to be a demo of MGR on it? O_O When was that announced?
Hey Blizzard, you would have a lot less complaints if your new game had a single player campaign that didn't require you to be always connected to your servers.
This just proves that Always online DRM doesn't do jack. As I said before DRM hurts the consumer more than it curves piracy/hackers.
@Magic_Spatula
I see we think the same then :)
Still the important question to Blizzard is;
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING WHEN THEY DECIDED TO HAVE IT, TO WHERE IF YOU WANT TO PLAY THEIR GAME THAT'S BEEN ANTICIPATED FOR YEARS, YOU HAVE TO BE ONLINE ALL THE TIME EVEN IF YOU WANT TO PLAY BY YOURSELF?
Seriously, I can't believe no one working there thought about the potential backlash that could happen if say they had to prefo...
@NeoTribe
Ah, still if that's the reason for the always online DRM, then the simple solution is to have a character that you can't bring online that you can use offline and a character that you can only use online. That way people who bought the game can still play the game that they paid for while the online portion is unavailable.
Agent Smith, your picture 100% describes the atrocity that DRM represents to the consumer.
what bugs me is why there isn't a larger movement against always online DRM. I mean sure it helps hinders piracy somewhat but they'll always find around that and still get the game for free.
Take this down time for example, players of Diablo III can't play it because the servers are down, but if players could *gasp* play offline in the single player campaign by themselves, this server downtime wouldn't matter.
DRM hurts the consumer more than...
Maybe if we buy this, they'll make a GG3! (hopefully XD)
no sir, there are medals for the items you listed in MAG, yes you need a certain number of medals for a trophy but you don't need all the medals.
As for Warhawk .....FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Wipeout I have the plat after many uses of a lot of foul language.
lol yes! I loved MAG, after I got the platinum trophy in it, I seem to only play it when my friends want to play it. It's a fun game to play with your friends but alone is just boring.
ah, a complete all missions with out raising an alarm trophy. I knew there was going to be one. Now I'm defiantly getting this game for the challenge (which I'll be playing on hard btw).
for the past few days I've been wanting to create a Twitter account just to tell lulzsec just that XD
There's a law in Japan that states that foreign companies can't own Japanese companies