This means you're in a great position. One of your games will get a discount, at least.
To me, Grow Home is miles ahead of the others, despite having liked both Stick it to the Man and the idea of Zombie Vikings.
But Grow Home seems too magic to be avoided. I'll buy it day one if it does not come free.
Good voting everyone!
(on Grow Home :D )
They would only have to change the reason, because the experience is the same. If not even the reviews (kind of professional gamers) didn't find this mechanic, you can expect that most people won't know about it and will suffer for the same reason.
Not having sprint or having it so buried that lots of players can't even realize it has the same effect in the end.
Look at the site. Consistency and ethics are not relevant at all. Just controversy and clicks.
You fell.
I don't even try to like COD games anymore, but at least these choose split screen over graphics.
It is mind blowing how naive most gamers can be, they believe in ANYTHING PR schemes tell them.
343 did not choose frame rate over split screen. They chose GRAPHICS over split screen.
They has a pool of three features that couldn't be there together: split screen, 60 FPS and shiny graphics.
Well, everybody now knows which...
Looks fantastic!
I'm very glad they decided to do a very good game instead of F2P.
Yes, currently one excludes the other.
The info on this article is so common and casual that I knew almost all of it by simply reading headlines. On this one, the fake headline caught me for an exception.
So probably only on reduced maps?
Best news since the reveal date. Ultra awesome! Game devs today are completely obsessed with balance and only with mods you can make overpowered chars. For the endgame, it can be pretty fun to mow down enemies, rambo style.
For me too, except when it comes from articles rehashing old content under fake headlines as if there was anything new inside.
This is jus recycled content. I'm not even reading Fallout 4 articles to avoid spoilers and I knew every single info from this "big news".
Terrible site and poster. I wouldn't expect more really.
My impression from the people I know from there is pretty much the opposite. :p
Easy there. This is far from being the final build, which can suffer of major frame rate drops if they don't do it right. The demo itself does.
Notice the word "can", because I can be as sure as you about how well or poor the performance will be. Preview builds mean nothing on this. A tech demo means even less.
And yeah, I don't immediately buy any promise companies do on their advertisements.
PS: Finally, if it is anything ...
Actually, you posted what I editted from the comment. ;)
Konami don't care about us. We shouldn't care about them.
Rumor.
"According to reports, two of Brazil's biggest footballing giants, Flamengo and Corinthians, have announced that they will not be a part of EA's new game and won't appear in FIFA 16. Instead, both of them have agreed a deal with Konami and Pro Evolution Soccer for this year's instalment."
Developing risky AAA games instead of addictive money grabbing schemes where they already make most of their riskless profit?
Don't act like AAA gaming is a better investment choice for a company already focused and successful on a more lucrative scheme. They don't care about core gaming. So what? Konami is over.
Amazing idea!
Let's just hope they release it fully and not the Rockstar way.
GamingBolt is pure and simple digital trash. No wonder this video is so bad. It is not on the so bad it's good department. Worse. So bad it is absolutely bad.
Just to notice, I am referring to Fallout 1 and 2 and Wasteland 1 and 2 on the reply.
Fallout 3 and New Vegas are action-RPG games, first or third person, very very different than the previous.
Check it out when you have the time. Both are very very good.
Cheers!
Do you press each button for five seconds when you are messing with controllers?
Notice that this is not Demon's Souls run, starting one or half a second after you pressed the button...
I didn't play the game and really don't know if it is on five seconds the timer to start the run. My point is that, if so many people had the same issue, it is a relevant critic.