Nope.
These are two different genres. Neither can clone the other so what you said is ridiculous.
Butter can you please stop replying to my comments and PMing me?
It's getting kinda of annoying. It feels as if you're flirting with me. I'm uncomfortable with it.
kaythanxbye.
Gears 2 is better than Gears 1. You can't compare Gears to CoD: Black Ops. Black Ops is an awesome game for causal gamers while Gears 2 is aimed at the hardcore. So it's natural that Gears 2 is not CoD: Black Ops good. Both are good games, but both are good games for different audiences. CoD: BO's audience being the casual market. Gears 2 audience being the 360 hardcore market.
The 3DS is inferior to the the PSVita. The Vita can play current gen games while the 3DS struggles to play Nintendo 64 games.
I agree not all games past a trilogy are bad. Battlefield offers fresh hardcore quality games in it's series for example.
CoD however offers the same thing every year which are Killstreaks and auto aim.
No.
The 3DS offers you a handicap experience because it doesn't have the second analog stick. In order to compensate this. Nintendo is releasing a bootlegged-getto form of second analog stick for the 3DS. So the Vita has the more complete experience.
No it is not.
Wii fit is more innovative than CoD.
This is a gimmick to get people to buy MW3 while BF3 doesn't need gimmicks. Quality production and fresh innovative gameplay is what gives BF3 the edge over MW3 imo.
Call of Duty lacks in the quality department and is bringing anything new, therefore your statement is false. MW3 uses gimmicks like Killstreaks and auto aim as an incentive for causal gamers to buy it while BF3 offers a near simulation experience.
Stop trolling on purpose.
PilotWings Resort's graphics are last gen graphics while Uncharted: Golden Abyss is current gen graphics.
U mad bro?
By your definition the Wii loses because it has the most exclusives, but 70% of them are trash.
When it comes to quality of exclusives it's:
PS3>360>Wii.
Counter Strike came before CoD and therefore cannot clone CoD, but pretty much every FPS after MW1 is a CoD clone with the expection Halo, Killzone 2(not 3), Resistance 1(not 2 or 3), Crysis 1(not 2), Team Fortress 2, and Brink. I might be forgetting a few, but you get the point troll.
Actually Sony has new IPs while Nintendo recycles a Mexican named Mario.
The only specs the 3DS has is "3D" and without it it's just a "S."
While there are FPS games that require skill, COD is not one of them.
The game has a noticeable aim assist. That right there is enough reason to say that COD requires no skill.
I dislike when people say "you can't adapt." Adapting has nothing to do with it especially if I find the game easy. O_O
And to say that seeing the other player first doesn't guarantee a kill is a lie. The main reason why people camp in COD is because ...
admiralthrawn87 took the words right out of my mouth. Here's what he said and I agree with him 110%.
""totally agree with article 100%. i use to be a huge multiplayer shooter fan but i quit because the need for skill went out the window. perks kill for you, and it comes down to who luckily saw the other guy first and pulled the trigger. before this gen, shooters required skill to win. jumping, quick ducking, good aim, knowing when to use certain weapons in certain ...
I agree with thugbob.
I like FF12 better than 13, battle system and all.
FFvs13 will be real time battles which is one of the reasons why I looking forward to it.
.
Come on, are they really planning a 13-3?
Now I'm really praying that 13-2 flops.
I'm not understanding SE at all. Everyone wants VS13. They should just forget about making squeals to 13. Seriously, out of all the FF games they had to make a trilogy out of the worst one?
If 13-3 halts the development of VS13 any further I'm going to have to shoot someone, preferably a SE developer.
The reason why VS13 > 13 & 13-2 is because vs13's battles happen real time.
@rapid
I'm specifically talking about these games.
13 is trash and 13-2 looks like more of the same so far.