I'm really confused on how people are playing this game on PC right now...beta doesn't release until the 29th so what are they doing that I can't?
"it happens when reality is catching up to the developers and they remember they need to make the game possible on consoles."
Bullshit. Pure bullshit. It happens because they want to show off the game and just make it look better for advertising. Just like in Watch Dogs or The Witcher 3, what they showed should and could have been possible. The Witcher 3 2014 showing looked better than the final game and that's with them having the final consoles for a while a...
Everyones? Speak for yourself. I couldn't stand emotionless monotone Toby.
No it doesn't. It's a game console. Not a way of life.
Agreed. His listed settings for the graphics and performance don't make sense. I can say that at Ultra settings the graphics aren't NEARLY as nice as I would have expected them to be. Would have thought PC would have gotten some better graphical upgrades then just the ability to turn certain effects on or off.
Yeah, really disappointing. Let's how the game looks better in the end though!
How do you have 10 upvoted and I've got 9 upvotes when you basically just said what I said above? You say no single player which coincides with my "amount of content" comment.
@Omegasyde
There's nothing wrong with my statement. It is a fun game and well made. The mechanics are nice enough and the sound and graphics are amazing. So, yes, the game is fine...it could have just used more of it hence "lack of content".
This is what I basically meant with the first sentence in my post above.
Getting downvoted for saying the same thing as other people that are getting upvoted LOL! Don't get it...
Right, because this makes sense. Battlefront, IMO, is a fine game. Only thing they really screwed up on was the amount of content.
Edit: Why are you people downvoting my comment and upvoting everyone that responded to me? Do none of you see where I said "Only thing they really screwed up on was the amount of content."? People like retrogamer09 and Fries1223 are AGREEING with me by ELABORATING on what I said. No single player = screwed up amount of content, as I s...
I actually enjoyed the third one. I think the second was the best though. First was fun for a while but that's just it...the game took a long while to complete. Honestly only made it like half way through because it just got soooo repetitive.
The second one managed to mix it up more and have a little faster pacing and nice action. The third was a little over the top in some places, sure, but the atmosphere was right. I don't know, series seems fine to me so far?
Oh yeah, I can PROMISE you that the new Ghost Recon game will only look about half as good as what they showed. Of course, it's Ubisoft, they wouldn't have it any other way!
Plus, really, just looking at that game proves it. No other game, IMO, comes close to those graphics in that open world so if no one else can do it on these consoles then what the hell magic does Ubisoft have? Oh...that's right...they have none because that demo was a lie. DOH!
Well this is disappointing. Honestly can't see anything from the latest build that looks even remotely close to the earlier showings. Seriously, everything looks to have been downgraded. Texture resolution, ground clutter and over all detail, car damage, physics...it's almost like the left hand side is the "next-gen" version and the right is "last-gen" or something to that extent.
Yeah...I'm playing it on PC so here's to hoping that it&#...
You understand that these games are made by different teams right? Not like each one is made yearly by the same people.
Also as we can see wtih a lot of games development time doesn't equal to the output of quality. The Assassin's Creed series has plenty of differences and changes between games. The same if not more as other multi-game franchises.
Some of you here are funny. So many of you keep going with the "they need to make something new they're all the same!" when...that's...like...the point.
You all realize that it's a FRANCHISE right? You all realize that like MOST franchises they all follow the same basic formula, right? Halo, Gears of War, Devil May Cry, God of War, etc...I don't see anyone saying that these are all the same so what difference does it make if Assassin's Creed is...
On PC so no Platinums from what I'm aware of? There's those Steam Achievements I believe but I'm not one to pay attention to them.
For me it's because I spent WAYYY too much time dicking around and not actually doing the main quests. Seriously, I've got like 50 hours in the game, level 30-something, max power armor, way over powered guns (everything I have has explosive bullets/shells, etc), I've explored a TON of the wasteland, I've done a crap load of side missiosn (I've explored all the vaults, etc)...so at this point, while I still enjoy the game, I'm sort of at that "meh" point. Lik...
What about this game was art exactly? It was boring and just because it was about some lesbians doesn't automatically just put it on a higher pedestal.
"One of the Best Games of 2013"
Here we go again with this shit...
So is this the same person that was working on the Metal Gear Solid 1 remake "Shadow Moses"? If so has he stopped that to work on this or something?
Game play and graphics look nice but that dialog and the voice actors are near cringe worthy! Which sucks because you know it isn't going to change.
Oh not only that but get rid of the radio static and interference from the captain. If I can have a clear and high quality call with someone 1,000 miles away on my phone or Skype then there's no excuse for it to exist on a space ship in the future. Come on now...
Is she black? Doesn't that make her inherently unlike Sonya? Not that race matters to me but I'm pretty sure that doesn't make her a "real life" Sonya. Just saying. Otherwise she's totally hot. Not hating. Just don't like titles like this one...a little over the top.