EA: issac clarke, dante, commander sheppard, john madden lol
gta 4, gears of war
gta: not what i expected, took to much away from san andreas, didnt really like niko, camera was broken, still good fun though, the episodes made up for me not liking niko
gears of war: just an average cover based shooter, the story never grabbed me, didnt like the character design/ characters
didnt know pc lacked split screen on some games, i guess they see it as most people are still gaming on little monitors rather than big screen hdtvs or most pc gamers game alone so why add it? sounds stupid but im sure alot of devs think this way or they're just lazy.
even though im a console gamer myself, i cant name one reason other than sony exclusives/ games that dont release on pc. everything a console can do a pc can do plus more. consoles are like pcs that became slaves, only the makers have a say of what goes on it and what doesnt, not the people.
@ Holeran
okay? i compared various active sets from sony, panasonic, samsung to an lg passive set and to my eyes, the passive looked better then all of them. thats just my eyes opinion its easier on them. like i said the image was brighter, the motion was better, the viewing angles were 1000 times better, on the active the screen would go almost black if i stood to far off to the side
games are great in 3d, id like to see a new tech called "nature speakers" used with 3d though, like imagine 3d porn with these "nature speakers" they release a timed water spray for when a girl starts squirting and you get misted in your face, or watching the movie tornado and you get blown back into your seat by the strong fans that come equipped in the "nature speakers" or during a desert scene they release hot air. you get the point. i bet thats going to be th...
@ tehnoob3
passive 3d is beautiful compared to steroscopic, when i tried them both in stores the steroscopic was dim and flickering, couldnt see off angles either, i suggest you actually try both before saying that...glasses are also alot cheaper for passive, lighter, no batteries...shit theyre free if you go to the movie theater...just take home those glasses,
yes they have but dark souls and dragons dogma from japan were alot better than sotd
bethesda, naughty dog, rockstar, ubi soft, ea...those are probably the best publishers this gen imo. most of their devs that created there great games are located in north america.
people hyped it up so much imo. i even got it for free from a friend... still deleted after 30 minutes.
if microsoft purchases them...even if they purchased 100% and owned all their games..that still wouldnt make me any more interested in the next xbox. wait why am i even commenting on this? activision...lol i could make better games in my toilet trying to sink my turds with my pee....
jk im not a hater saints row and prototype are okay i guess.
wtf are you even saying right now?, i know wireless n is about wireless transfer rates. downloads are faster on my xbox 360 slim which has a wireless N adapter, about twice as fast as my ps3 download rates which has bg. something like 4 mbps vs 2 mbps.
Thats why 360 downloads quicker because of the wireless n card in it right?
open world and real time combat would save final fantasy...at least real time combat...id start buying them again.
i liked and hated things about all consoles this gen. in terms of bang for your buck, ps3 by far won.
ps3 good; exclusives, chargeable controllers, free multi player, blu ray, changeable hard drive, browser
bad: lacked wireless N speeds, no party chat
xbox 360 good: wirless n speeds, party chat, jtag
bad: lacked exclusives, no chargeable controllers included, no free multi player, no blu ray, no changeable hard drive other th...
yeah you know what i meant, free roam. ive been waiting for an open galaxy style space game, no ones pulled that off on consoles yet kinda makes me wonder why.
open world mass effect :)
console makers dont need exclusives to sell a system. microsoft proved that. im not exactly sure what sells the 360 though, maybe because its easy to pirate games on and it was cheaper at first, thats why i purchased one..because to buy an unreliable console (at first) for 3 okay exclusives and pay to play multiplayer makes no sense. i mean all of its games other than halo, gears and forza are on pc. wtf is that?
i did buy ps3 based on exclusives/ free multi though.
...
dude try dragons dogma then...thats exactly what it reminds me of, assassins creed, monster hunter, dark souls, and skyrim mixed. amazing game.
assassins creed is actually a good series though, at least they add some new gameplay features instead of just upping the graphics or rehashing like cod, gears of war and the like.
if its true it should be no more than 100. ps3 slim 160 gb goes for 150 in pawn shops around my way. theyll be leading console sales for sure if they price at 100$