A certain number of PS3 games look better than anything out. So if you're a developer and your game doesn't beat those games in the looks department it doesn't make sense if your game looks better on 360 because nothing on 360 looks as good as the better PS3 games. I think it's a new measuring stick. And until the 360 has better looking games than the best Sony games it's pointless to try to prove who is the gold standard.
Using earlier games to compare the 360 and PS3 running UE3 is tricky because even though it's a middleware, devs didn't really know how to program for the PS3. Looking at the Wolverine screens (although they are small shots) to me it looks a little better on PS3 because I notice more details for some reason. And I also played that Batman Arkham Asylum demo at a kiosk at Toys R Us on PS3 and it looked and ran like a good game. Honestly the PS3 is tricky, but I really wouldn't doubt UE3 show...
But Microsoft's Biggest Fan isn't you...it's Capcom :)
Nevermind, Microsoft's biggest sack rider is Square Enix but Capcom is a super close so close it chafes second.
That's right, you shouldn't. You should spend that money on a cheap whore in the neighborhood instead of getting sloppy seconds after Microsoft :)
EDIT- Omegasyde, you're ruining my joke pretending to take it seriously. But seriously, the local whore is better than the Bethesda whore who should have put whatever they had on the bluray disc instead of catering to the DVD size and then going along with the jerk-off and preventing the only ones who could have had the content all...
Atari doesn't have enough money
Please do not suffer the same fate as me
Microsoft wants a game from them just so they can say the 360 can run a game by these guys too
Does anybody actually believe this? Like while SE was making all the 360 games and not a single PS3 game, did you think they weren't making the 360 version of this game too. In all honesty it's far FAR more likely that the 360 version has been the source because they have experience dealing with it, it's obviously easier to understand for them, and they've had the 360 dev kits longer. Do you honestly think they waited for PS3 development kits to start Final Fantasy which is their main mone...
Maybe then we can get multiplatform games that come remotely close to filling a Bluray disc.
That cool ass creature you bond with dies in the end
It's not Microsoft. Square Enix is the one to blame. If they didn't have the "name" Final Fantasy on the roster, they wouldn't be any better than Koei now because they haven't been in years.
stay in school. You're onto something.
I see where you're trying to go with it, but it's a movie game. Do you honestly think they have where it follows time through day and night cycles instead of being on rails.
Microsoft posted another heavy loss this past quarter for its game division while Nintendo and Sony both made money in games. Granted Sony is able to do this because it has the PS2, PSP, and 3 on the market selling and if they only had the PS3 out they may have looked like Microsoft, but end result is money. 2 out of the 3 made it.
Microsoft doesn't so if any were to quit I would be surprised if Microsoft wasn't the one because they really haven't had any real success to justify a future in it. And no, just launching a year earlier and now selling the system super cheap just to keep a couple sales away from Sony is not cause to celebrate.
Everything in life is a competition. Life itself is a competition.
is almost as great as Cheech and Chong. Hey, there's an idea...
A Cheech and Chong fighting game.
What?! I remember reading a bunch of 360 fanboy sites (like what else is there) claiming the game was awesome.
and if I get any disagrees it's from the 360 fanboy that spent 60 bucks plus on the game and he or she is going to defend the purchase.
Misery loves company
if anything cums out they will swallow it and say only the Unreal Engine can do that
.