Regardless, if it is actually "sarcasm" or if he just uses the word sarcasm to remove his responsibility of what he writes, why would anyone (other than investors) care what place a console is in? Or care how many sales? All I care about is that that number is enough to allow continued support from that manufacturer.
As long as Sony, (ps4) MS, (XB1) and nintendo (WII U) are happy with their sales and continue to produce amazing content and services, I could care les...
I really am looking forward to dance central, fun to play with my wife. Best part only 10 bucks for the new one. Also, ori looks great too.
Sunset, forza horizon 2 and halo MCC are all reasons for me. Will be playing the crap out of all 3. Pretty sure halo MCC has me most excited, it's just so much content and original halo 2 multiplayer sealed the deal.
EDIT: @gareth luckily, you can buy the sunset xb1 for $399.99 AND still have money to buy a second game.
Yea, same here idk if he is a good choice, however the people who are making this game give me no reason to think anything other than him being a great choice.
I have never seen it personally, but considering the name is in the title it pretty much makes the report moot...
@superman never seems to have effected you
http://n4g.com/news/1431317...
http://n4g.com/news/1404352...
<...
Just a bit over a momth ago you said it was pipe dreams that wasn't possible. Now it's possible, just not happening fast enough to satisfy you? What will be the issue when it is released? As well, MS has used the cloud in multiple games already, so the cloud is being used currently, it is just going to expand when ready. (titanfall and forza 5 come to mind) So, yes, they did sell it as a feature at launch, and they have applied it to games @ and after launch.
Just a ...
Why is this being overlooked? This further explains what MS' cloud has in store. So we've now seen it, (e3 star tracking, and BUILD 2014) it's been applied lightly to games already, and now we have a fleshed out description with large scale testing.
@blacktar your manufactured sense of confusion is absolutely hilarious, you aren't fooling anyone.
You original comment was:
"Nick why are you #1 on all these tomb raider articles. That one you posted is not even filled with one person giving the article any validation just like this one. "
The fact that you had to secretly go back and try to add things to it without putting "EDIT" before hand is telling, shows that even you r...
You clearly haven't been looking, there are at least 3 a day on here usually at least on in top 5 heat. For example just a few minutes ago.
http://n4g.com/news/1571332...
@blacktar I usually look at pending news, not approved news. Two articles about 5 minutes apart makes it easy to place a comment in each .... why a...
Lol .... the badgering from the media (most likely in order to get hits) over this is just getting silly now. Not a chance that this deal weakens xbox... especially considering tomb raider was the second highest increase (31% increase) in preorders after gamescom.
EDIT: Just for comparisons sake, bloodbourne (also a highly anticipated exclusive and actually showed it's first gameplay) increased by 16%. I only mention this as 2 people PM'd me saying "there is a re...
That will never happen, they need something to bitch about, regardless of if those same things are being/have been done by their company of choice.
Honestly, I wish Sony would have allowed the choice. $30/year (aka $2.50/month) for 10% of all EA games and DLC, access to an expanding vault, and early access to FULL games 5 days early is a pretty amazing deal. However, even if you don't think so, you could just, not buy it.
Strangely, no quote from amazon or any kind of source... so we just assume this is all accurate and not based on an hourly chart (instead of weekly/monthly) I mean I guess, who cares, but if someone is going to post this kind of stuff you expect some kind of sourcing.
you were concerned about publishers offering their entire backlogs, 10% discounts on all DLC and games and early access to games for 30$/year (aka 2.50$/month) ... how terrible. I for one am looking forward to that.
Wow, the visuals look about twice as good as at E3, which already looked good. The environments look great.
Essentially, plus the 53fps avg that DF came up with is based on one 2 minute portion of the game that is especially intense. (So probably has a much higher avg fps in reality) I have yet to have any significant drops and I am a few hours in.
900p @60fps locked or 1080p @53fps avg I would say 1080p was the right call, at least for this game. Both ps4 and xb1 versions have drops when there is lots on screen, IMO 53fps avg is not what I consider sacrificing fps for res.
Both versions have minor drops .... 53fps avg for the xb1 version is not as terrible as you pretend. (Especially when the PS4 is not a perfect 60fps either)
KZ MP was 47fps avg, bf4 was around the same as KZ (both ps4 and xb1) and a few others and that never seemed to be near as much an issue as you are claiming this to be.
If the difference is 60fps avg vs 53fps avg, unless it is an fps I would say just do 1080p. If the difference is 45fps vs 60fps probably...
Considering we are only 10 months in, calling either the winner would just be based on bias. PS3 was wayy behind and ended up selling just as many units as the xb360. It's all just a matter of long term.
Either way as long as Sony, (PS4) MS (xb1) and nintendo (wii u) are happy with their current gen console sales and continue to support them, I could care less who "wins."
Yea, I really liked quantum break, looks like a winner. It is basically max payne brought into this gen and looks to be done well.