Mr_Potato_

Contributor
CRank: 3Score: 19780

Well of course it's ok. PS3 sells at twice the price, and it sells the same number worldwide as the 360 (source vgchartz), so it makes double the money for Sony... I don't see where is the problem there.

And as gamers, we're happy too since you've got the greatest number of AAA games on PS3...

The fact that poor people can't buy the console doesn't make it less enjoyable or profitable.

Ferrari will always sell less cars than Ford.

6069d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

well yeah since the PS3 has the best lineup every year (with 30+ internal studios vs 3 for MS, it's not very hard actually...), it's only logical you hear that every year ;)

every year is the year of the PS3, until MS buys 20-30 internal studios...

6069d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yeah, they've got a lot to learn. Hey dumbasses, you're nothing, PD sold 50 million games. Wake me up when you sell 50 million games.

6070d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It clearly show they're dumbasses. Forza will be poor man's GT forever, stop dreaming Turn 10, GT sold >50 million games and you're nothing.

6070d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

L4D was not AAA and this DLC probably won't be either.

GTA DLC and Halo DLC : yeah cool, more DLC for the win. AAA means full game, not DLC nobody cares about.

We already had 4 AAA full games this year (not DLC) on PS3 and there are tons more to come like Ratchet, Uncharted 2 and MAG, so really you should just avoid talking games. You're the one looking stupid. Again.

BAM !!

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Getting one too, I wanted a PSP anyway, and this sexy one is perfect with 16 Gb and more portability.

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

No he can't see that cause he's a 12 year old American dumbass kid.

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

LOL

So true

Pedobear : only on 360.

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

lol chozen, bubble+ that comment made me laugh.

6071d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

then you wake up and all you see is Kojima explaining MGSR is a crappy action spinoff he hates, and the real sequel is MGS Peace Walker on PSP.

6071d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Natal is not revolutionary at all, the tech has been studied by Sony and Nintendo for years, so welcome in 2003 Microsoft.

Unlike PS3 or Wii Motion Control which you can use in games, Natal is completely useless except in stupid mini games since with no controller, you have no PRECISION and no FEEDBACK to play, which are two major components in gaming control.

EA boss already said PS3 motion control was better, and Tony Hawk already dismissed Natal too.

...

6072d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, mummy refused to buy them a PS3 and they're angry since they had no AAA exclusives since last november.

Please forgive them.

6072d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sony easily won the E3 with tons of games and exclusives, PSP Go, FF14 exclusive, next rockstar A team exclusive (the agent), masterpiece The Last Guardian from Team ICO and so on...

Even MS CNET acknowledged Sony won the E3, so looks like you're the one needing a reality check :)

It's all about content, and Sony has tons more because they have tons more talented studios.

FACT : PS3 and 360 now sells the same worldwide while PS3 costs twice more... Who ...

6072d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Omg... Seriously this game kills everything in graphics. I loved the first, can't wait for the sequel.

6072d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Natal is not revolutionary at all, the tech has been studied by Sony and Nintendo for years, so welcome in 2003 Microsoft.

Unlike PS3 or Wii Motion Control which you can use in games, Natal is completely useless except in stupid mini games since with no controller, you have no PRECISION and no FEEDBACK to play, which are two major components in gaming control.

EA boss already said PS3 motion control was better, and Tony Hawk already dismissed Natal too.

...

6072d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Natal is not revolutionary at all, the tech has been studied by Sony and Nintendo for years, so welcome in 2003 Microsoft.

Unlike PS3 or Wii Motion Control which you can use in games, Natal is completely useless except in stupid mini games since with no controller, you have no PRECISION and no FEEDBACK to play, which are two major components in gaming control.

EA boss already said PS3 motion control was better, and Tony Hawk already dismissed Natal too.

...

6072d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Natal is not revolutionary at all, the tech has been studied by Sony and Nintendo for years, so welcome in 2003 Microsoft.

Unlike PS3 or Wii Motion Control which you can use in games, Natal is completely useless except in stupid mini games since with no controller, you have no PRECISION and no FEEDBACK to play, which are two major components in gaming control.

EA boss already said PS3 motion control was better, and Tony Hawk already dismissed Natal too.

...

6072d ago 3 agree5 disagreeView comment

At least Sony showed a nice demo and the tech is actually USEFUL in GAMES, unlike Natal which will stay a gimmick I think, since with no controller included you can't use it in any hardcore game.

The major difference is you can SIT and PLAY with Sony motion control, while you can't with MS. Not everybody wants to dance in front of his TV, plus those who want already have a Wii.

6072d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Like EA that said Sony motion controller was better ?

Or MS CNET that said Sony won E3 ?

Yeah, everybody agrees Sony won.

6072d ago 8 agree3 disagreeView comment

Bu bu but... wait for E3 2010 ! ;(

6074d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment