It's based off of the old pentium 4 chip, I believe, so I don't expect a high performing gpu to come out of a cpu manufacturer.
Hate me for saying it, but I feel compelled.
This game looks awfully queer, haha.
"Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
Metal Gear Acid Mobile
Metal Gear Solid Mobile
Metal Gear Solid: Portable Ops Plus
Metal Gear Solid: Digital Graphic Novel 2
Metal Gear Solid: Portable Ops
Metal Gear Solid: Digital Graphic Novel
Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence
Metal Gear Acid 2
Metal Gear Acid
Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater
Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes
Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance
The Document o...
Thank you :)!
If you read my original post, that's what I said, the low resolution shots don't look very good. Why would you even release screenshots the resolution of a psp? o_o
Please don't obviously and blindly disagree with me just because you don't hear what you want.
because, truth be told, these screens don't look good. I'm sure these don't do the real game justice.
Pretty low resolution shots.
What resolution is the game going to be running at?
But I'm not! ;D
I have
-3.5ghz E8400(plan to take it to 4ghz)
-2GB DDR2 1066
-1GB Super super clocked GTX280
-500GB space!
I hope this game doesn't have the gigantic lags in populated places like Age of Conan :(.
After reading Steph's full post, it sounds like a new Final Fantasy game rather than a Zelda game, lol.
noooo, no rpg leveling, that would ruin the zelda series. The strength Zelda has is that it's so unlike any other game. Also, I wish they would go back to the more western themes of Ocarina of Time, compared to the more eastern Twilight Princess (Link looked like an anime chick -_-).
you're just an idiot, Crysis does bring my card down to it's knees. At 1920x1200 very high I ONLY get 30~35 fps, and if I enable any AA the frames suffer. Final Fantasy spirits within doesn't look very photo realistic, just very well rendered CGI.
You can't measure the usage of a whole console by a game in a percentage. Doing that alone makes you enough of an idiot, saying something like Crysis in all of it's eyecandy glory is possible on consoles as it is on PC's is also stupid, please, if you're going to say crap like this, and want people to believe it, show some solid evidence. My 1,800$ pc with E8400 3.5ghz core 2 duo CPU, SSC OC'ed GTX 280, and 2GB DDR21066 ram strains to play crysis 1920x1200 very high at a solid 30~35 fps. Now ...
Even though it's stupid to argue with idiots like you, I'm bored, so I'll do it for shi*s and giggles.
I have a GTX 280, it has 240 processing cores, and 1024MB of ram, it outputs almost 1teraflop. That ONE chip I have in my computer is much more powerful than your PS3. So, sure, a CPU is more powerful than ram (How do you even think of crap like this? o_o), but a GPU is much more powerful than a CPU.
Hot porn stars aren't skanky? That's a double standard if I've ever seen one.
My Superclocked GTX 280 outputs 933 Gflops, GPUs ftw! :D
What makes this game look good is it's very smooth animations, neat lighting effects, and what looks so far as great physics explosions all mixed with decent graphics. I don't really think it's the "OMG BEST GRAPHICS EVAR" judging from the video, but it definitley looks appealing from what I said above along with the minimal HUD appearance. Overall, it looks great due to the amount of polish and work put into it. ( and I hope to god it's at least 10x better then KZ1)
I think it's weird you don't shave your bush.
~_~
A 8800GT for 125~150$ or a 4850 for 200$
The "his" looks awfully small, like too small...
Oh come on, Phenoms are crap. A E8400/E8500 is totally worth it's price more then a phenom. Also, you should get more up to date with your argument. The 3xxx series from Ati wasn't all that great. It's newer line is much better. But still, if you want the best you go to nvidia. I recently built a system with a E8400 ( took it up to 3.5 ghz) and a super super clocked GTX 280 ( was only a bit over 500$) which performs stellar. I thin you need to research your point better.