Cybershot sounds great, I hope more cameras take that route. The only thing that stops me from buying a Sony Camera is the fact that they use MemoryStick Duo's instead of SD cards, I think that's really really stupid.
It's just showing off the physics engine, and it's a bit more impressive then some destructible debris. Also, that's a far away shot of a cutscene, if were going to compare faraway backdrops in a game then I can say Halo 3 has better graphics/tech than Crysis.
Don't forget to watch in high quality.
I've seen the topic of physics brought up in many posts in this discussion, yet I don't see the basis for it. Sure, there are some destructible environments in KZ2, but in Crysis, you can break down the majority of trees with multiple break points, most buildings are destructible, and you can even pick up chickens or crabs and launch them.
Here look at this video for a demonstration of Crysis's physics engine.
@ myze Well now, I agree the animations in KZ2 are really smooth, I love them, but everything else you said, I have to disagree with. There is much more going on in Crysis, it's set on a whole gigantic island, the draw distance is gigantic, and you're rending many many things at once unlike KZ2 which is a linear game with bounds on where you can go. Also, I doubt you have played through Crysis or Crysis:Warhead because they're anything but boring, it's basically like playing through an Action...
why are we comparing two drastically different games?
Tell me where Killzone surpasses Crysis? That's right, it doesn't. When you have a high caliber game on a high end pc with software like DX 10 that isn't available for the PS3, then you're going to have the superior graphics on PC.
http://www.hamst3r.com/imag...
http://www.hamst3r.com/imag...
It's how ridiculous the claims have come from insanely misinformed console kiddies.
I bought a PSP first day of launch, and I admit, it was pretty fun the first year or so. Then I pretty much had no more use for it, it really was a waste of 250$ at the time. I later got a Ipod touch as a present, and the article is a bunch of crap, I have over 1000 NES games on my Ipod.
Yeah you know, disregard the fact that the fact that the Iphone's processor is twice the clock speed of the PSP's.
Disregard the fact that the Iphone has four times are much ram as the PSP...
Any other PS3 game will be better then this, and we know it. Just look at the bland gameplay they're shooting for, and the crap they've released already. I don't care if it's alpha, it shouldn't look that sloppy.
The same CLOCKSPEED, not performance, not sure if you know, but Core2Duo architecture>>>AMDx2 plus you can OC the 45nm E8400 EASILY to 3.6~4 on air.
That 4850 will take on COD4 and 5 easily, hell I can run COD5 maxed out with max AA + AF on 1920x1200 with over 60 fps on my GTX 280 most games are easy as hell to run, the only ball breakers are the PC exclusive DX 10 games.
You would be surprised how many games, especially the best looking ones, are not even native HD. Some are in weird ass 4:3 instead of 16:9, so the whole 720P line gets fuzzy once they do that.
Aren't these the same bad screenshots we've seen since the announcement of this game? We haven't seen any gameplay to judge the actual game content yet, but the graphical aspect of this game is an absolute mess.
The dead harvest has the same Zoey on it, but minus 5 fingers, wonder how that happened.
http://www.interlopers.net/...
But you switch between the 9400 for power saving and the 9600GT for performance, no hybrid sli.
Please, go slap yourself.
Mods make games like this, like eliminating the no gameplay after the ending, the high res mods, and what not. Running this game with the improved textures at maximum 1920x1200 with full AA and AF at 60FPS is quite amazing.
The screenshots from that older article about the ground textures impress me much more then the ones in this article. All this article shows is some pretty bland player model textures and models, although other sceenshots prove otherwise.
Also, your list is kind of moot to Crysis, KZ2 is on a VERY small scale compared to Crysis where there are a billion things happening at once while still maintaining just as much detail up close as in the distance. I'm currently making my way th...
My 3.6ghz E8400 will have to hold me over till x58 boards get cheaper. How much of a performance boost is it for encoding video? Also how do the new multipliers work without any FSB?
I get 25~28 fps on 1920x1200 enthusiast/gamer 2xaa with Crysis on my OCed GTX 280 + e8400,
but I get a good steady 35~40 with my GTX 280 on maxed 1920x1200 with maximum AA ( I think it was 4 or 8) on Cyrostasis.