Hoping for a pc version
Fallout is not even in the same league.
SATAII was just a bad idea. No idea why Sony and MS would do that.
"at it's core it needs to be good"
A game, movie, or TV show can be excellent and have attractive people. One doesn't preclude the other.
I really like what capcom has done with the art style and costumes.
Already have the game pre-ordered.
Hot people make the game more visually appealing to me. Like movies and TV, at it's core it needs to be good. Including attractive people makes it more entertaining.
Well I have a GTX 970 so I should be good.
Very happy to see major publishers supporting VR.
My estimation of Ubisoft increased.
I completely missed the Bloodborne story. Over 20hrs in and I have yet to witness any story really.
They should build some hype in February like Sony did with PS4 then have the big reveal at E3.
Me too, my PC is connected to my TV so both offer the big screen, 7.1 surround, comfy couch controller, experience.
I have more friends on PS4. But I'd have to renew my plus membership. So conflicted.
I really enjoyed FF13 until I got to a boss I couldn't pass. If I recall, it was some three headed robot thing. I guess I sucked, but it ended up ruining the series for me. First Final Fantasy game I couldn't pass, but If I couldn't pass the first there was no way I was buying the second.
Mine ruined my R6Vegas. Never moved the console at all.
Although, I remember the original xbox used to put rings in discs.
In terms of price, an AMD card for equal price is always far more powerful, problem is it's on paper only. In real world performance the less powerful Nvidia card outperforms the more powerful AMD card far too often, even with in cases with more video RAM and more shaders.
AMD is not doing well, they hardly make any profit and often lose money each quarter. I really hope they turn things around because the industry needs competition.
Well, if my experience with the Surface Pro 4 is any indication, MS claiming "up to 5.5 hours" really means 2-3 hours in real world usage.
MS claims up to 9 hours for SP4, the average user gets and every review of battery life reports 4.5-6.5.
Everything should come on PC, there's no reason not too especially considering that PS4 and Xone are much closer to PC architecture than previous gens.
It's just more money for devs and happier PC gamers.
That's a good thing. The less fragmented the user base the better it is for VR.
Hopefully, there won't be too many Oculus and HTC exclusives.
Let people pick the hardware they want but let everyone enjoy all the games. Also provides a bigger consumer base for devs which ultimately means more games for everyone and a better chance for big devs to get on board.
I hope Ubisoft keeps the PC version as detailed as the E3 version. There's obviously no need to downgrade the core assets on PC such as the amount of debris, junk and cars on the street.
I hate when devs create core asset parity between PC and console, there's no need.
Release on both.
Because I have PC.
Because I don't care about day 1.
Because I do care about 60FPS and higher graphical settings.
Because if the game's good, I want the developer's work to be appreciated by more people.
Because I feel more people being able to play a game is far more important than console wars.
Because I don't enjoy a game more knowing others can't play it.