Even on the scene project, modding, fansub, fantranslate, even with no money involved, the more people gather, the more the probability of a clash happen. That's just natural.
DmC is better than DMC
Yep, they should have at least 1 Japanese studio with 2 teams in it specialize in JRPG.
--He also recounted a moment when a reviewer was brought in to test a beta version of The Last of Us and complained about the lack of boss fights and laser weapons.--
Demand for laser weapons...that sounds so "american" to me...
I'm surprised that you don't even know their position. Stop selling COD on Steam and the sales will drop even lower, and making a deal with Nintendo is to weaken Sony's argument that MS will monopolize COD. In short, Steam is a partner to MS while Nintendo is harmless (useful).
Let me explain this to you chronologically.
MS : we'll buy Activision
Sony : That's antitrust behavior
MS : Don't worry, we'll still release COD for Playstation as long as it exist
Sony : I don't believe you
MS : Tch. Okay, how about a 10 year deal?
Sony : nonsense!
MS : We commit to release COD for Nintendo for 10 years (don't care Nintendo players want it or not)
Yeah, i agree...
That's right. 3DS's DQ8 was not the port i wanted with all the jaggies and deforestation. I was really disappointed so i'm not finished with this issue, i want a proper port/remaster without graphical downgrade.
Sony assisting Callisto Protocol with over 150 employees, while at the same time, Bethesda think they're on an advantage for not developing Starfield for PS5. Shamed mentality.
Chinese retro & emulation devices company might sell you $99 but i don't think it will be Microsoft/Sony's build quality.
Yea, many underestimated the cost of a controller, it's quite expensive, even more so a controller inside a portable device. Chinese devices for retro & emulation with better controller & build cost quite significantly higher than it's cheap counterpart although the specs are quite similar.
Sony had to decide whether to focus on console or portable because they can't provide PSV and PS4 with AAA contents at the same time, not enough resources i think, or to make PS4 content was much more profitable.
Nintendo can provide Wii(U) and (3)DS with contents because the nature of the games on both system are low specs but not for long. Eventually they make one hybrid system now.
There's only one Ragnarok. Ragnarok : Online.
- IGN Korea -
See...they're offended...
That's true, western market became more aware of Yakuza franchise since then.
As long as in English, just remaster is okay, no urgency for remake/kiwami,
N64 lost to Playstation, Gamecube lost to Playstation 2, DS was a success but 3DS performed worse than the predecessor in sales, and not long ago Wii U is a basically failed product.
Switch is dominating Japan, yes. Nintendo itself not always dominate Japan.
No
I might've known how you feel. Crossover/all-stars games rarely caught my attention, the cause of the crossovers is usually deus ex machina and the setting is shallow (just like visiting Disney worlds one by one). So, it's difficult to consider the story "serious".
I was excited when Square announced first Kingdom Hearts more than 20 years ago, but i stopped playing it because of bad camera implementation in the game though.
I doubt that's the situation. Many console owners admit they buy COD not because of favoritism, but because that's their habit. A person thinks, "i'd like to play a shooter", shooter=COD, so they buy one. That's a brand positioning COD has. That's the reason why COD sold many yet a lot of people criticize it.
Once PS owners realize no COD for them, they'll get over with the situation, in the end it's not that really bad a situation. As ...
1% revenue is quite many. Means if they take 30% profit from their revenue, they actually give 3% and so on.
I believe you regularly give more than 1% of your revenue that's good, but as a company whose behavior is always driven by profit, the executives deserve credit.
Feels 2000s-ish