Turd vs. Turd. FIGHT!
If I wanted the Sony dildo, I'd own a Wii. If I wanted Project NotAtAll, I'd own an EyeToy/PS Eye/generic netcam.
If this is the future, the future looks bleak. Controller4Life.
They gotta stop trying to kiss Sony's ass. They made their bed with Microsoft, sleep in it, move on. It's obviously not taking any advantage of the PS3 if it's got a pretty much identical counterpart on the 360.
The moneybag trinity is complete. Only shown at Microsoft conferences, only advertised for 360, only bundled with 360. Let the illusions of exclusivity commence.
Expect the same for Metal Gear Rising.
Microsoft left that Kool Aid out for everyone, okay? Don't just drink it all yourself.
I agree with some of it, but yeah, a majority of it is pretty crappy. No Silent Hill, no God of War, no Metal Gear Solid. On the other hand, I'm proud of them for resisting the urge to make all 10 spots a trade off between Modern Warfare 2 and GTAIV.
I think the color and the temple on his back are a dead giveaway, it's gotta be Cronos.
Same, it's the only football game I ever liked.
Tisk tisk. Don't sink to Turd 10's level.
They're wrong about that dusty chained titan. 99% sure it's Cronos, not Atlas. The chained thing on his back is Pandora's Temple, from GoW1.
So... we ready to chuck Yoichi Wada off the roof of the SE building now?
*puts my jacket on and gets my keys*
Doesn't bother me on the 360 controller, but it's really fail on the DS3. Fortunately most devs know that, and map it to R1 instead.
I think Aaron Greenberg says it every year, but this time it's actually true. It usually comes in the form of something like: "we have an unparalleled lineup of exclusive experiences for Xbox 360 this year". *PR headache*
2010 has been stellar for the 360 so far. I just hope they don't derail their sweet lineup of games by focusing too much on Natal. Motion controls are a turdy spot in both camps for me this year. Wish they'd leave that crap alone.
It wouldn't be so suspect if they weren't also the only other outlet besides GameSpot to make the same claim. Everyone else said the PS3 version looks better, or identical at the very least. As for your "challenge" (lolsrsbiz)...
"After finally playing through both versions, I can say that the 360 version appears to have a slightly sharper design when in real-time, while the PS3 version appears to look better when running CGI cutscenes, likely due to BluRay enabl...
^ If he had used his own words it wouldn't have been a problem. People who agree and disagree with the opinion both seem to acknowledge that it was copied from GameSpot. But maybe you're right. I guess "green" is a total raging PS3 fanboy, cause he pointed it out too. Make sure to let him know he isn't a 360 fanboy anymore.
GameSpot - "However, we noticed at this stage that the movies on the Xbox 360 suffered from more compression than on the PlayStation 3, whi...
Final Fantasy XVI. Exclusively multiplat.
Totally agree. Why is the "big leap" always to a sh*tty movie? Make some good sequels if it's that big. Don't drag it down with an inevitably horrible film.
First outlet (GameSpot) to claim the 360 version looks better. Everyone else to comment after playing both say it's the other way around, or fairly equal in-game. Funny that Seedhouse blatantly copy/pasted what GameSpot wrote and passed it off as his "hands-on" opinion.
Wow, someone else who knows RoTT. Kudos on that.
I lol'd. Bungie has never been a graphical powerhouse. It's just not what they do. You can like Halo more than God of War all day long, but Reach eclipses GoW3 in graphics? That's just idiocy squared.
Pretty old, but a classic. I've been thinking about getting a gaming tattoo. Perhaps something Fallout related.