I have a PS3 and a PS4, I certainly don't want to play the inferior version of a game if I have the option. As for physical versus digital, there are people with data restrictions or that just prefer owning a physical copy for various, understandable reasons.
But that's not the REAL issue. I was more than happy to pay $15 for Journey and that game doesn't even have replayability. The real issue here is that Konami is selling what appears to be a glorified demo for...
What I'm most worried about is if Ground Zeroes comes packaged with The Phantom Pain. That would personally outrage me. I really, really hope Konami isn't arrogant enough to think that is even slightly acceptable.
I am a FIRM believer of this. Journey was a $15 game that was a two hour experience that didn't offer replayability in the traditional sense; yet, it is one of my favorite games from the last generation and a game that I have a deep emotional connection to.
With that being said, sometimes things just don't feel right. Obviously I don't know a lot about Ground Zeroes, but it seems like it's similar to the Tanker chapter at the beginning of Metal Gear Solid 2 ex...
Unfortunately, I don't see how any rational person can disagree. Take all personal bias aside for a second.
Every Nintendo home console has sold fewer than its predecessor since the beginning, aside from the Wii. Now, this has nothing to do with profitability of those consoles (mainly because I've never seen a figure divorcing home console profits from handheld profits), but merely the fact the the audience for those who buy the hardware has continuously shrunk. Gamer...
The problem is so many people focus on the fanboy arguments instead of the well reasoned ones. I don't get it.
Here's the deal: The resolution and framerate wars started whenever the specs for the consoles leaked/were revealed and people began debating the power difference between the PS4 and the Xbox One.
Then the resolution for multiplatform games like Call of Duty: Ghosts and Battlefield 4 leaked and the PS4 was not only a higher resolution, but a ...
With all of the crazy graphical things they are trying to do, this doesn't surprise me. As long as it's steady, I'm cool with it.
I love the idea behind this game, I just hope they are able to nail it. I imagine it's going to be very difficult to find that right balance of making it tense, and difficult without making too punishing. The pacing is going to be very important too.
Cautiously optimistic.
Is Tomba too well known for a list like this? Not sure. Glad to see Klonoa number one, it was a really great platformer. I actually think it would be a great game for Sony to revive as a budget/downloadable only game. SCEJ get on it!
I definitely liked the episode, but after the long wait I was pretty disappointed with how choppy the framerate was.
Dat headline...
In most cases, I'd rather pay for a traditional game than a Free to Play one. I'm sure there are exceptions to the rule - and I love the option F2P gives you - but I've played some Warframe with a buddy of mine and I can't help but wish the game had that level of polish, balance and variety you expect out of the traditional model.
Shoot, I've been playing all these games for no reason! What have I been doing with my life?
Thank you for opening my eyes.
Masterpiece? Really?
Interesting move. Besides Killer Instinct, which got good reviews, Double Helix has mad nothing but mediocre to bad games. Now, many of those games fall under the category of rushed by publishers to make a quick buck. So, it's hard to know exactly how talented a studio DH is.
I don't know how the OUYA compares to other media centers, but it's ridiculous to compare it to the Xbox One or PS4. Sure, it plays games and is probably the better media center, but the PS4 and Xbox One are just so much further ahead in what they can offer gaming wise that I don't see the point of the comparison.
Yuna is really good, but I'd go with Celes from FFVI.
Worst is Vanille by a mile.
PlayStation Now isn't for new games, it's for older games.
I wish it were that easy, but it's not. For the sake of the argument, let's say company A makes a console that - compared to its competitor's - is lacking in most non-game software and hardware elements including a value proposition that seems to be off. Then, let's put some really good games on said console. It's not going to sell. For the right gamers, it may be perfectly fine; but the company can't pay its employees with good vibes from enthusiast.
...
Double post.
Apparently if it's really, really good it's worth it.