He's a reviewer not a critic, he does have to be unbiased towards its score.
unprofessional is an understatement. Was it reviewed by a 14 year old?
yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah!
I think that they are scared of showing the better looking PC version. Just look at the reaction to the console version, if it looks so different, the gamers who are on console will feel left out and complain, like we always do.
everytime i see a picture of watch_dogs i'm like YAY! more watch_dogs news, then it's a stupid story about graphics spite.
wouldn't it be graphics were* downgraded...?
come on! I've just finished infamous and, like ryse, that was an example of style over substance; The graphics were amazing i held the share button so long it might be broken a bit and the story was a filler in the middle that basically tells you how the game was going to end fr...
no more money = goooooood
InFamous: Third Age.........?
but is it really news worthy when Titanfall is coming to 360 next month? no it isn't
good, should happen to every so called "insider"
no
there are a lot of coincidental issues happening at once, nothing to worry about.
no thanks, i've already played it once.
infamous: SS was a game where the dev only focused on graphics when being developed. The frame rate dropped a lot and the story (to me) was predictable from the start unlike the previous 2. Graphics were definitely top of the list for sucker punch this time around.
Sorry but it's true, there are a lot of screenshots shared by me using the share button but not any videos because there is no need.
if the xbox one had those features, the playstation would have had them as well.
i want a bounty hunter game! got on with iiit!
Reviews in general are "just opinions," how about focusing on more important issues?
My comment will be one of the worst received but its true, the content isn't even considered in the score. the only thing that affected the score was the price and the length, not the important aspects like playability and graphics.