The only problem i have is that the game doesn't let you takedown civilians. If you can shoot them, why can't you take them down by other means? it's just a bit silly to me.
I can confirm that it does, it's the first thing i did in the game and it's very very satisfying :P
can anyone tell me how to get to the Ambrose theater on the game please?
it is, it looks better in the day time and the night mostly because the obvious next gen quality of watch_dogs's graphics are mixed with the wind and rain tech of ubisoft's.
It's been sent out already to some in the uk and the reaction I've heard might convince even you Mr. Author :D
My my this site is morbid today.
Reviews mean BALLS ALL!
It's not classed as bad UNTIL you play it so it's a vicious circle. What if critics liked it and you didn't would you force yourself to like it or blame them for somehow making you buy it?
that's the point lol NO ONE can unanimously hate something like a game or a film. it's all affected by taste.
I love George Orwell's 1984
My favourite show is Person of interest
My favourite film of all time is the bourne ultimatum
How can i possibly not want to buy watch_dogs?
Why rely on reviews, make your own decisions!
no it's the strategy ubisoft are going with. It's on a "Watch review and play next day basis." If you see this game getting 8 or 9/10 and want it, you can buy it anytime that day it's simple.
Games like transistor have had the review embargos dropped until the day of release and that game got excellent reviews so overall, no i'm not worried by this one bit.
When i see Watch_Dogs, it shows how suspicious and nervous gamers can be, wh...
I reckon it will have a release date announcement
spring next year.
yes, reviews matter balls all. It's up to me what i like.
any kind of level/chapter/checkpoint select?
Thta's what people don't seem to get, everyone wants pc QUALITY GAMES FOR THEIR NEXT GEN CONSOLES AND ARE SHOCKED WHEN THEY TURN OUT DIFFERENTLY.
you must be new to N4G, graphics are all people care about now.
This isn't Crysis though. Graphics are all Crytek have. Since when were games like Grand theft Auto and Assassin's creed judges on how they look instead of what you can do?
That's a bad thing, most consumer will not care or want to know as the game DOES look fantastic. If you see a game with good graphics that intrigues you, would you want someone to say "Oh you like the look of watch dogs? That game has been graphically downgraded, you should thank me for that." ?
Buzzwords and whiny 14 year olds that like shiny shiny graphics.
Right, f*%# off now with the "downgrade" stories. Those gifs yesterday showcased how good it looked to me, it sometimes looked photorealistic.
just because it's popular to say it's had a downgrade, doesn't mean you should let everyone know that you've heard it has, you're not game experts and never will be, especially with that kind of attitude.
if you don't move for three days, it's what you deserve. There are stories about game safety everywhere.