You really should play MGS3 all the way through, i know there`s a bit to much conversation at the beginning, but trust me when i say this is one of the best PS2 games out there. It isn`t without reason it has gotten the reviews it has.
Nice to be able to understand a (bit more) of it too. Good find Soul.
I just can`t get over how good it looks, seems better than most ps2 games, and on a psp. How Square-Enix has managed this is beyond me. If the game get`s good reviews, i`ll have to get myself a psp. I`ve got a good feeling seeing this trailer, so i`m confident it won`t be another Dirge of Cerberus.
Agree completly
a bit too much jaggies at the beginning, which could be because of the video quality, but as countless others have said before me here, GTA is about the gameplay, not graphics, although i would want a better framerate than in the previous games.
It would be cool to see what actual changes to the gameplay they have made. The targeting system should be better i would hope. Well,for me this was just a teaser,and maybe we `ll get to see more gameplay specific stuff at E3.
if they can make it in 1080p now, that would be great, but it`s far more important to get the constant 60fps. Sigma will look good anyway, and a game like this needs to run fluid. You don`t want to die because of a bad fps.
Yeah i think it will eventually be on PS3, but it`ll be a timed exclusive for the 360 (not counting the PC here), and that isn`t bad for Microsoft.
The game looks great every time it`s shown, and could end up like a hit if the gameplay can match
i got to say i got a good feeling about the game, after seeing the trailer. If it get`s great reviews and being the FF7 fan i am, i`ll pick up a psp in order to play it.
the hype around Killzone is too great, i agree. And the first one was a good, but not mindblowing game, which needs to have the issues with it corrected, if Killzone 2 is going to be better. The first game had a good art direction, and was a fun, but flawed experience - bad fps, multiplayer, and variation in the gameplay.
Addressing those issues should be the goal with this game, not how close it`s going to get to the first trailer (even though that will be interesting to see t...
Yeah good idea, assuming the gap betwen them isn`t too great
if it does turn out to be an april fools joke, it will defiantly be a good one hehe.
I can understand that they are focusing on their first party exclusives, due to the lack of install base, but third party exclusives are important too, even if they`re only for a limited time, because they help the install base grow and could help secure other exclusives, and so on. Exclusives (and how good the system is and it`s cost) are why we buy consoles as Silverwolf points out.
Another thing about Sony`s first party line up is that some games and developers have a lot to...
Naughty Dog also makes brilliant gameplay, so this will be good.
They should show more at E3 2007
Hehe although a bit late. Burnout is from Criterion which EA bought, i wouldn`t call it the same thing as internal EA developed game if you get what i`m saying. I know they own them and all that.
SSX was good though, got to hand them that.
Lots of good points as usual. The most important thing about Killzone should be the gameplay, since the first one was a fun, but flawed experience.
Unfortunately, Sony has made the focus on the graphics because of the E3 2005 trailer. That means if the game ends up fun, but not as good visually (and it won`t either) as the first, they`re going to hear it. And bad news will be over Sony again, i don`t think they need more of that, after a good showing at GDC. That said, i think...
I`ve got to hand it to you, i didn`t think this would happen. You were right on this one. I will follow your posts more closely from now on. You`ll also get a positive feedback for this.
Interesting stuff about what you said about Motorstorm too. I think it was released too early, which Sony has a habit of doing unfortunatly. I would hate to see that happen to Killzone as well, because if it turns out to be a good but flawed game again,i wouldn`t be sure of it`s future. The Get...
This can wait until the new E3, so we can judge a gameplay trailer (hopefully) for ourselves.
I don`t think it will match up the the first one, but honestly i would rather have a great game than just a good looking game. Still i want them o get as close as possible, as long as it don`t equals a bad framerate.
Hehe, fine i`ll hold you to that. I don`t we`ll see it before E3, but i didn`t think they would show any of it at GDC either ;)
wonder if the game manages to be scary too, i would like a scary horror game, since Resident Evil 4 (although a excellent game) assn`t as scary as the ones before it. Maybe it has to do with me growing up to hehe ;)
i think it misses the main point of why PSP isn`t doing better. Sure longer battery time, onboard flash, a better screen, and extra analog stick or a redesigned control mechanism, would be most welcomed, i`m not totally convinced that a camera and gps could "save" it. It would be fun, but how much would it cost ? Because that`s what`s wrong with the PSP (and to some extent PS3).
The price and the lack of really well made games for the platform (PS3 is looking better ...
but i guess it`s a good thing if the titles can live up to their potential. It better than to rush them isn`t it ? Not that many great games come out in may anyway, so i guess we`ll see Heavenly Sword and Lair close to a august-september or at later point.
And to Deepbrown, don`t feel bad. Release dates are never certain and due to change anyway.