lol?
Ha ha ha hoo hoo ho ha ha heee hee haa haa haa ho....
and I thought MY jokes were bad
Fear 3? Yawn.
Like I've said before, we'll see just how good it looks once it ships and is in the hands of reviewers. Until then, it's all just blah blah blah hype, praise, spin and PR talk.
We'll see when the game ships whether this statement is true or not.
How about we worry about polishing Crysis 2?
Oh come on....can we just let the Pokemon games die gracefully?
This is better than that!
Waaaaaaaah
A beautiful first-person parqour game turned into a jump / run / kick sidescroller.
BORING
Smart people saw this and called it before anyone had to explain it.
22k was absolutely ridiculous to begin with...not even remotely believable...unless it was all NPC dialog.
And one day we'll find out that it was because of DVD medium in Xbox 360...but to silence critics and protect Microsoft's horrible decision to continue with DVD9 this gen, the devs will say "OH NOEZ WE NEVAR HAD TEH SCRIPTZ DAT LONG@#@! WE PLANNED TO CUT IT SHORT ALL ALONG!"
Right.
Well...hmmm.
I wonder if this is done by Valve this time...or if it was passed off to a third party dev again?
I wouldn't be surprised if it was passed off...that dumbass Gabe Newell is so stubborn in regards to PS3 development.
I can't believe he ever could possibly think that a 30+ million person market of PS3 users wasn't worth taking the time to make games for.
Even if only a couple million bought their games, in the PS3 market, it would...
Blah blah, we shall see when the game arrives in hands of reviewers.
Why was my previous comment deleted? It was relevant and regarding another user's comment.
Alan Wake WAS in fact dumbed down for the 360. Original footage was the PC version running on Intel Quad Core with 4GB of RAM.
I'm just stating fact. There's no way a game originally shown on a high-end dev PC will fit into an Xbox 360 with 1 less processor with way less cache and half the video memory and 1/8th the total system memory, looking as good as the devs originall...
I bet we'll soon see a comparable Android tablet that will be more useful and cost-effective than the iPad.
There's already one...it's a bit smaller on resolution and the processor isn't as fast, but it's android-based, and Google's mobile OS has already proven its usefulness. Plus, Android can multitask while the iPad / iPhone / iPod Touch are restricted to Pseudo-Multitasking (push notifications, a.k.a. jump-in-jump-out task switching).
So what if it's not as aesth...
Unless a webcam is put in the iPad, and the OS is changed to take advantage of all that ugly-ass empty space on that huge screen, then I don't care WHAT games it plays, I'm not saving my money for one. For 500 dollars, Apple should have all kinds of exclusive OS features that wow the hell out of you. But no...it's just a blown-up iPod Touch with a couple things tacked on like screen rotation lock and whatever else.
The iPod Touch is perfect for me. The iPad compels me in a total ...
Sucker! Haha...jk. So how do you like the iPad? Worth it or not?
I'm waiting until 2nd or 3rd gen iPad before I even begin to consider getting one.
Thanks to all the early adopters who are beta testing the iPad for me! Muahaha
The two comments above me are golden.
Bubbles!
Although, I wouldn't mind a game that was set during the days of the Crusades...that would be pretty intense to play as a Crusader in the King's guard or something.