The reasons you give don't coincide and they aren't the issue for people I've actually enountered.
There is only one issue for 90% of the people who want a Wii U. It has a shortage of large scales game releases. Anything beyond that is fanboy conjecture and wishful thinking.
It has been proven and reproven that price is not the issue. It has been proven that hardware strength is not the issue as any game with the effort made can do more than any l...
You mean one major game announced so far. There will also be indie games coming out in June.
It is also possible that the Wonderful 101 could be coming in June. Its still more than half a month left for thing to be announced.
From what I've seen, its far beyond rivaling either of those games.
Well said, Nintendo is playing it smart.
The only people who are complaining about Nintendo not holding a press conference are people who don't like Nintendo, and that should speak for itself.
Why would gamers who normally belittle Nintendo products, want them to become software only, and biggest of all, constantly express how they have no interest in what Nintendo releases make such a fuss about them not holding an E3 press conference if it was good for ...
If they were to make that effort and spend the money, why would the write want them to limit it to the PS3?
I see port begging for this didn't take long.
Rubbish articles like this are already spawning. Gaming pseudo-journalists are about to have a field day with this.
What do you expect from a site called playstationlifestyle.net? Facts, rationality, and unbiased analysis? Not in this article.
They aren't skipping e3. How is it that this lie is still permeating?
Are you serious?
The problem is that there are a lot of devs on the fence about how they will support the Wii U if at all and piracy is going make a lot of them reconsider making games altogether leading to less games and lower quality games for people who legitimately buy them.
It will also lead to multiplayer hacking which will ruin the fun that other people have playing games on the console.
I used to love the scene back in the day because they generally focused on emulating older games that no one could find anymore and opening up region support. These people actually cared about the gamers and tried to support the companies as well. They actually made gaming better.
The modern scene is filled with arrogant scumbags who just want rep. They care nothing about devs, manufacturers or gamers. I'm tired to trying to play a legit game online and some cheater ruini...
You could have fooled me with the way Sony fans were talking about Soul Sacrifice.
Of course, the Wii U doesn't need saving. The situation is over exaggerated by the gaming media. The are lower than expected but not failing. It's still making Nintendo a profit overall as the last profit report showed.
It will have many games by the end of the year. When the games come, the sales will spike. That is all there is to it.
X360 support. Now I don't know about this anymore. If 360 supports gets added then the quality of the game will suffer.
They'll have to make it the 360 the lead platform or they wont be able to port it(see Trine 2 Dev comments) and the Wii U version will look and run like all of the other bad Wii U ports.
And by the time those are out, Nvidia's next line of of GPU and Intel's next CPU will be out making the PS4 and Xbox 3's power obsolete. So what's your point?
If you want the strongest hardware and best looking games, then is foolish to buy any console because they all suck compared to the PC. Power isn't what console are supposed to be about. They are about cost effective gaming, stability and uniqueness.
My PC is already stronger than th...
I don't get these, prove it, show me, i'll believe it when I see it, and all of this other in arrogant stances I see people giving to these statements.
Developing HD games can take years. Its like people have forgotten this.
Metal Gear Solid 4 and FFXIII didn't release in the PS3 launch or even the year following. Halo 3 and Gears of war didn't release in the 360's launch. It wasn't until both of their sequal that the 360 really showed...
Did you actually read the comment by Iwata? Its the first sentence under the title.
I am of the same mind as him. This won't happen overnight. Making games takes time. The average AAA game takes at least a year to develop and the Wii U isn't even a year old yet.
Rushed games are generally garbage. I would rather have a good game with 16 bit graphics than a shiny, graphically astounding looking game that plays like crap and has bugs everywhere.
I would actually think about getting this game if it didn't have EA's name on it.
Nothing. Zelda for the Wii U should be original and creative like usual.
The only thing I want to still see are a sword, Link and Princess Zelda.
From there, I would rather Nintendo be as original and creative as possible.
I believe what has been consistently true, and one thing that Nitendo rains supreme in is consistency whether good or bad.
They have always released quality products and have taken as long as they saw needed to release them if they felt they were not ready. Zelda 64 and Twlight Princess are clear examples, both of which were scrapped completely and remade because Nintendo wanted a higher quality product.
Nintendo will take as long as they feel is necessary to...
You mean "TRUE" gamers care about the games. They are not to be confused with fanboys. A true gamer only cares that the game is good. A fanboy primarily cares about whether or not its on their favorite console and and what bragging rights it gives them.