About your daughter - is it human ?
:P
It's not like this is a new thing. This has been the plan for a while now. Not to mention this has more to do with graphics and the GPU.
Most of the 'technical debt' they currently have seem to be related to CPU and RAM usage (along with networking).
" well Detroit looks a million times better than your game and cost less."
Don't be silly please. The two are very different types of games.
"I expected way better than Uncharted 4 graphics, not just being on par."
You say that like it's easy to do. It isn't really on par with Uncharted 4 overall imo, but that depends on what you're comparing, the gameplay or cutscenes. Uncharted 4's realtime cutscenes are honestly like CGI a lot of the time.
Don't you get what 'AAA' means ? If your game is AAA you have to compete with other AAA games. Graphics is a HUGE part of that, everyone knows that. There's a reason Sony first party devs spend so much time pushing that so much. Production value is not a low priority.
"Its about the gameplay and story"
The problem is the gameplay. Sounds like a nightmare to develop something that lives up to the standards of other AAA games. Just from a technological standpoint - how do you have highly detailed open world environments when the player can fly through all of them and make them crumble ? What about the physics for all that ? What about AI and NPCs ?
The problem with superman is that he can just about do anythin...
"Keep it to pc if they want"
It isn't going to run on a console. Right now, we can see they're already struggling with what are most likely CPU and memory issues, on a very high end PC. That's not surprising, given the amount of things they're simulating at any time, and at that scale.
If it was GPU bound, there might have been a case for making it run, atleast on XOne X or PS4 Pro.
If you're referring to Wolfenstein 2, that is a massive complement. Think about what SQ42 is doing compared to Wolfenstein 2. Think about the scale and scope and seamless nature of it, and all the simulation going on. That capital ship is an actual capital ship floating through space.
Nothing is canned, nothing is baked. It's all being simulated (which can add a lot to the game depending on how devs take advantage of it).
It was certainly a treat to the eyes. The Idris capital ship looks amazing. It's like Wolfenstein II levels of quality, except it's an actual ship floating through space. Their space stuff looks absolutely mindblowing.
Characters range from amazing to looking a little strange, depending on lighting conditions (lighting is very important). Animation and performance detail is unmatched though. The nuance in their performance is staggering.
Can confirm, I also went to a shady website but it was totally legit and now I make $90/hour
"In Free Race mode you can also choose ANY car and ANY track right from the start so there's no need to try to unlock this or that to use in the campaign "
That's a good thing in a proper sim. It's not a racing game like Forza, it's a hardcore racing sim in it's structure. Having to unlock cars through some career mode would be horrible. This has more to do with your game preferences than anything.
Or maybe the author just didn't like the demonstration in the aspects that were pointed out ? Did you ever think of that ?
I think this game can pull off better scenes than SC, but it doesn't have the same level of detail. In SC you can zoom in down to the character level and have highly detailed models and high resolution textures (which is what makes it so amazing). Battlescape doesn't even go there.
That said if you were to just focus on higher level shots, Battlescape Infinity is super impressive ! They've been working on this tech for a long time, and the results are great.
yep. Ofcourse games are art. Why wouldn't they be ? They are literally a combination of a lot of other artforms + much more that you can't get in any other artform.
What ? When ?
No, you won't see it for a while. It probably won't even come to current gen consoles. Most probably next gen.
no, there's nothing 'bad' about nudity, but nudity and sex are censored for their own reasons. Violence is censored for it's own reason too (being 'bad' and 'traumatizing').
Just like sexy women in games doesn't cause "sexism". Ofcourse not, it's about it being porn.
Porn and Violence are not the same thing at all, and they aren't censored for the same reasons. Steam don't want pornographic content on their service and that's fine.
Your sister is lying about her job and she's probably selling drugs.