that it simply wasn't done anywhere near as well,
and didn't have the flow to it, if you will, of the previous two games.
I think that was the problem with a lot of shadow of the tomb raider.
it does not feel anything like the previous two games, it feels very "rote/ by the numbers"...
it felt (for myself) like they didn't have a ton of plot to work with either, so they tried to push the archaeology aspects of it, as far as that being this fascinating thing to study culture, and the cultures/people and all that just weren't that fascinating. it really got to be a bore to me, a LOT of the game I found very boring and repetitive, which I was quite surprised.
previous two left me really wanting to see what was next...
eidos Montreal did the third game,
not Crystal Dynamics
although they used all of the same assets and had some help with the world building
I think that was one of its biggest problems too.
the first two I enjoyed the third one to me was a slog, I didn't enjoy it anywhere near as much.
unlock this capability so you can go back through the game yet again, to areas you've already been just to collect things you didn't get.
...
that's probably one of my biggest complaints against (particularly) open world games,
is this collectathon shit. where they do nothing but pad the game out with picking up things that are absolutely useless,
and in so many ways it's not even funny.
not towards his customers, certainly not on the level of Tim Cook.
Activision, screwing up the patch.
apple has become a corporation of greedy controlling assholes since Steve Jobs passing, Tim Cook is one of the worst.
he takes corporate greed to a new level.
it's about time somebody challenged both apple and Google's app store policies, because it's well beyond a Fair trade/Fair commerce issue at this point.
it's absolutely ridiculous.
Google needs to focus on security above all Else, because theirs is a complete joke.
I can't exactly say that I disliked it,
but there was some design decisions I certainly didn't like in thief.
but the majority of it was a good solid playthrough.
I just felt it should have been in third person, I missed having the dagger and I thought that his upgrade for the eye was absolutely useless.
that, and there's at least two sections of the game that were "a little too familiar" as far as past games, if you know what I'...
just finished Quantum break.
perhaps I will ask you your opinion of it in another thread,
for now I'll just say...
enjoy✌️
ask Activision.
for the Xbox it's a code rewrite,then reinstall.
and that's all on Activision not on Xbox
but trolls are going to troll aren't they?
as an Xbox centric person,
I can definitely say without a doubt: that puts the box in Xbox.
I sure shit won't be getting it for the aesthetics...
I find the router comment pretty interesting as far as the PS5 design, because when my son saw it that was the first thing out of his mouth "it looks like a giant router" 😏
stand-alone campaign for miles isn't supposed to be that "long" of a game,(?/!) but I think it will be from what they're saying, a hefty chunk of content in and of itself.
what's confusing people is that there essentially reusing or I should say simply that they're utilizing,
assets that are already in place like the city, a lot of the heavy lifting is done as far as the mechanics/ capability/ setting, all of those things.
it's simply ...
so is the majority of this website.
"usually made for (this) system and then ported to the other one" where the hell do you get this shit from ?!
absolutely.
but it does give Paul tassi another opportunity to shill his crappy novels.
welcome (partially) to game pass, Sony owners.
although an Xbox, we were able to do this long before game pass.
there is no "war"
just a bunch of ranting Fanboy idiots.
I think the only way it's going to happen, because again they don't have control over the IP contracts, obviously is, if each one of the developers go separately to someone.
I truly believe in the end that's what will wind up happening.
oh you actually have it,
do you ? ... 😏